Aryan (25 years) and Aditya (32 years) are two individuals, resident in India, and they earned salary of 13 lakhs each during the previous year…
CA Final · Direct Tax Laws and International Taxation · MTP · November 2024
Aryan (25 years) and Aditya (32 years) are two individuals, resident in India, and they earned salary of 13 lakhs each during the previous year 2023-24. Aditya had paid interest of 2,20,000 on loan taken in respect of a self-occupied house property. Aryan had paid - 24,000 towards medical insurance of himself and his spouse. Payment was made through net banking. Aditya contributed - 1,50,000 to a political party by cheque. You, as a consultant, are required to advise them whether they should opt out of default tax regime under section 115BAC or otherwise, showing the tax liability of both individuals.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Computation of Tax Liability of Mr. Aryan & Mr. Aditya for the A.Y. 2024-25 as per section 115BAC Particulars Mr. Aryan Mr. Aditya Income under the head "Salaries" Salary 13,00,000 13,00,000 Less: Standard deduction u/s 16(ia) 50,000 50,000 12,50,000 12,50,000 Less: Set-off loss from house property in respect interest on loan for self-occupied property [not allowable as deduction u/s 115BAC] - - Gross Total Income 12,50,000 12,50,000 Less: Deduction under section 80D & 80GGC [Not allowable as deduction u/s 115BAC] - - Total income as per section 115BAC 12,50,000 12,50,000 Tax Liability Upto 3,00,000 Nil Nil 3,00,001 to 6,00,000 @ 5% 15,000 15,000 6,00,001 to 9,00,000 @ 10% 30,000 30,000 9,00,001 to 12,00,000 @ 15% 45,000 45,000 12,00,001 to 12,50,000 @ 20% 10,000 10,000 1,00,000 1,00,000 Add: Health and education cess @4% 4,000 4,000 Tax Liability 1,04,000 1,04,000 Computation of Tax Liability of Mr. Aryan & Mr. Aditya for the A.Y. 2024-25 as per regular provisions of Income-tax Act Particulars Mr. Aryan Mr. Aditya Income under the head "Salaries" Salary 13,00,000 13,00,000 Less: Standard deduction u/s 16(ia) 50,000 50,000 12,50,000 12,50,000 Less: Set-off of loss from house property in respect of interest on loan borrowed for self-occupied property, restricted to 2,00,000, as per section 71(3A) - 2,00,000 Gross Total Income 12,50,000 10,50,000 Less: Deduction u/s VI-A Section 80D – Medical insurance premium 24,000 - Section 80GGC – Contribution to political party by cheque - 1,50,000 Tax Liability 12,26,000 9,00,000 Upto 2,50,000 Nil Nil 2,50,001 to 5,00,000 @ 5% 12,500 12,500 5,00,001 to 10,00,000 @ 20% 1,00,000 80,000 Above - 10,00,000 @30% 67,800 - 1,80,300 92,500 Add: Health and Education cess @4% 7,212 3,700 Tax liability 1,87,512 96,200 Tax liability (rounded off) 1,87,510 96,200 Since tax liability of Mr. Aryan as per section 115BAC of 1,04,000 is lower than the tax liability of 1,87,510 computed as per the regular provisions of the Act, it is advisable for him to not to opt out of section 115BAC. However, in case of Mr. Aditya, since his tax liability as the normal provisions of 96,200 is lower than the tax liability of 1,04,000 as per section 115BAC, it is advisable for him to opt out of the default tax regime under section 115BAC and pay tax as per regular provisions.
Topics: Tax Planning, Tax Avoidance & Tax Evasion
Related Questions in this Topic
- Mrs. Varsha is engaged in business and her turnover for the PY 25-26 amounts to 18 crore. She has duly complied with the...
- State with reasons whether the following Act can be considered as Tax Planning or Tax Management or Tax Evasion: (i) On ...
- Rahul, an Indian citizen, left India and settled in United Kingdom from 10.4.2016. He had never left India previously si...
- (ii) Yellow Ltd. (an Indian company) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pink Ltd., a company incorporated in Country H. Pin...
- Discuss whether the provisions of General Anti-Avoidance Rules can be invoked in the following scenarios: (i) Red Ltd.,...