Rahul, an Indian citizen, left India and settled in United Kingdom from 10.4.2016. He had never left India previously since April, 2008. He acquired…
CA Final · Direct Tax Laws and International Taxation · MTP · May 2026
Rahul, an Indian citizen, left India and settled in United Kingdom from 10.4.2016. He had never left India previously since April, 2008. He acquired a property worth 200 lakhs in his name in the financial year 2013-14 at Malaysia. The Assessing Officer came to know of this in March, 2026 based on the investigation made by Enforcement Directorate in some other person's case. The Assessing Officer, having recorded some concrete evidences against Rahul, issued a notice under section 10 of the Black Money and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 on 27.3.2026. Mr. Rahul's counsel contended that since Mr. Rahul is not a resident in the financial year 2025-26, a notice under section 10 could not be issued to him. Is the issue of notice on Rahul under section 10 of the Black Money Act, 2015 tenable in law? Examine.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Every assessee would be liable to tax@30% in respect of his undisclosed foreign income and asset of the previous year. Undisclosed foreign asset would be liable to tax in the previous year in which such asset comes to the notice of the Assessing Officer. The term "assessee” defined under section 2 (2) of the Black Money Act includes a person being a resident in India within the meaning of section 6 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the relevant previous year; or being a non-resident or not ordinarily resident in India within the meaning of section 6 (6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the relevant previous year, who was resident in India in the previous year in which the undisclosed asset located outside India was acquired. Since Mr. Rahul left India and settled in United Kingdom from 10.4.2016 and has not visited India at any time thereafter, he would be non-resident in India in the previous year 2025-26 in which notice is issued. However, he was resident and ordinarily resident in India in the financial year 2013-14 when he acquired the property at Malaysia. Accordingly, the issue of notice on Mr. Rahul under section 10 of the Black Money Act, 2015, is tenable in law.
Topics: Tax Planning, Tax Avoidance & Tax Evasion
Related Questions in this Topic
- Mrs. Varsha is engaged in business and her turnover for the PY 25-26 amounts to 18 crore. She has duly complied with the...
- State with reasons whether the following Act can be considered as Tax Planning or Tax Management or Tax Evasion: (i) On ...
- (ii) Yellow Ltd. (an Indian company) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pink Ltd., a company incorporated in Country H. Pin...
- Discuss whether the provisions of General Anti-Avoidance Rules can be invoked in the following scenarios: (i) Red Ltd.,...
- M/s Durga Associates, a partnership firm, obtained declaration in Form No. 15G/15H from its lenders/depositors (wherever...