Mr. Ajit, a practicing Chartered Accountant, started a coaching institute for CA aspirants in Delhi. He displayed large hoardings across the city…

CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · RTP · May 2026
Mr. Ajit, a practicing Chartered Accountant, started a coaching institute for CA aspirants in Delhi. He displayed large hoardings across the city stating: "Coaching by CA Ajit – Also Undertaking Audit, Tax Audit and Attestation Assignments. Contact for Professional Services." He also circulated pamphlets in nearby commercial areas inviting businesses to appoint him as statutory auditor. Further, CA Ajit responded to a tender floated by a listed company for statutory audit work. The tender document did not prescribe any minimum fee. Furthermore, audit and attestation services were exclusively reserved for Chartered Accountants. Examine whether CA Ajit is guilty of professional misconduct under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Give reasons.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Advertisement through Hoardings and Pamphlets: Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 prohibits a Chartered Accountant in practice from soliciting clients or professional work either directly or indirectly by circular, advertisement, personal communication, interview or by any other means. In the present case, CA. Ajit displayed hoardings advertising his audit and attestation services. He also circulated pamphlets inviting businesses to appoint him as statutory auditor. Such acts clearly amount to direct solicitation by advertisement and circular, which is expressly prohibited. Further, as per Council Guidelines, advertisement of coaching/teaching activities in a manner that indirectly promotes professional practice (e.g., linking coaching with audit services) amounts to indirect solicitation and is also violative of Clause (6) . Although a member may display a signboard outside coaching premises mentioning the name of the institute, contact details and subjects taught, large hoardings promoting professional services are not permitted. Responding to Tender for Statutory Audit: Clause (6) permits a member to respond to tenders or enquiries issued by users of professional services. However, as per Council Guidelines a member shall not respond to any tender in areas exclusively reserved for Chartered Accountants (such as audit and attestation services), unless the tender document prescribes a minimum fee, or the services are open to other professionals also. In the given case, the tender is related to statutory audit which is exclusively reserved for Chartered Accountants. Also, minimum fee was not prescribed in the tender document. Hence, responding to such tender violates the Council Guidelines and amounts to professional misconduct. In view of above, CA Ajit is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 for directly and indirectly solicitation of professional work through hoardings and pamphlets and responding to the tender for statutory audit.

Topics: Professional Ethics & Liabilities of Auditors

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic