PN and Associates are appointed as the Statutory Auditors of The Iron Company Ltd. The Central Government holds 65% of the paid-up share capital in…

CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · MTP · November 2026
PN and Associates are appointed as the Statutory Auditors of The Iron Company Ltd. The Central Government holds 65% of the paid-up share capital in this company. The appointment letter of the company gave a very limited time to PN and Associates for accepting the audit. CA N, the engagement partner communicated with the previous auditor but due to lack of time, he had to give acceptance for the audit assignment before receiving reply from the previous auditor. Hence CA N gave a conditional acceptance of the appointment and commenced the audit. Discuss with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the schedules thereunder, whether CA N has complied with same.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

As per Clause (8) of Part I of First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he accepts a position as auditor previously held by another chartered accountant or a certified auditor who has been issued certificate under the Restricted Certificate Rules, 1932 without first communicating with him in writing. Although the mandatory requirement of communication with previous auditor being Chartered Accountant applies, in uniform manner, to audits of both government and Non-Government entities, yet in the case of audit of government Companies/ banks or their branches, if the appointment is made well in time to enable the obligation cast under this clause to be fulfilled, such obligation must be complied with before accepting the audit. However, in case the time schedule given for the assignment is such that there is no time to wait for the reply from the outgoing auditor, the incoming auditor may give a conditional acceptance of the appointment and commence the work which needs to be attended to immediately after he has sent the communication to the previous auditor in accordance with this clause. In his acceptance letter, he should make clear to the client that his acceptance of appointment is subject to professional objections, if any, from the previous auditors and that he will decide about his final acceptance after taking into account the information received from the previous auditor. In the given case, PN and Associates are appointed as the Statutory Auditors of The Iron Company Ltd. which is a government company as Central Government holds 65% of the paid-up share capital of the company and CA N has given a conditional acceptance of the appointment and commenced the audit. In view of above, it can be concluded that CA N has complied with the provisions of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the Schedules thereunder.

Topics: Professional Ethics & Liabilities of Auditors

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic