CA Karan, a practicing Chartered Accountant, was approached by Greentech Solutions Ltd. requesting him to issue a certificate regarding the…

CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · PYQS · May 2026
CA Karan, a practicing Chartered Accountant, was approached by Greentech Solutions Ltd. requesting him to issue a certificate regarding the utilization of term loan funds for their expansion project. The company had received 25 crores from a financial institution and needed to submit a utilization certificate within 60 days of disbursement. CA Karan issued the utilization certificate, stating that the entire loan amount was properly utilized for the intended purpose. However, his verification process was limited to reviewing the summary reports provided by the finance manager and brief discussions with the managing director. He did not examine the bank statements, supporting documents like purchase invoices, contracts, payments, etc. The certificate did not mention any limitations or assumptions made during the verification process. Four months later, it was discovered that 5 crores of the loan amount were diverted for purposes other than the approved project, leading to regulatory action against the company. Comment on the action of CA Karan with reference to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and Schedules thereto.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

According to Clause (7) of Part I of Second Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he does not exercise due diligence or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties. It is a vital clause which unusually gets attracted whenever it is necessary to judge whether the accountant has honestly and reasonably discharged his duties. The expression negligence covers a wide field and extends from the frontiers of fraud to collateral minor negligence. Further, as per Clause (8) of Part I of Second Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, a Chartered Accountant in practice is deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he fails to obtain sufficient information which is necessary for expression of an opinion or its exceptions are sufficiently material to negate the expression of an opinion. In the given case, CA Karan issued a utilization certificate for a term loan of 25crores stating that the entire amount was utilised for the intended expansion project without conducting adequate verification procedures. His review was restricted to summary reports provided by the finance manager and discussions with the managing director, while he failed to examine supporting documents such as bank statements, invoices, contracts, and payment records. The certificate also did not disclose any limitations or assumptions in the verification process. Subsequently, it was discovered that 5crores had been diverted for purposes other than the approved project. This indicates gross negligence and lack of due diligence in the discharge of professional duties, as the certificate was issued without obtaining sufficient appropriate information which is necessary for expression of an opinion. Therefore, CA Karan is guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (7) and Clause (8) of Part I of Second Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

Topics: Professional Ethics & Liabilities of Auditors

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic