M/s. Arora & Taneja, a firm of Chartered Accountants with four partners, has recently been recognized for its strong commitment to professional…
CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · PYQS · January 2026
M/s. Arora & Taneja, a firm of Chartered Accountants with four partners, has recently been recognized for its strong commitment to professional development and community service. During the F.Y. 2024-25, the following instances came to light during a peer review: Support to ICAI Programme Organizing Unit (PoU): The firm contributed funds to the "Financial Reporting Update Seminar" organized by one Program Organising Unit of the ICAI. The event had prior approval from the CPE Directorate, and the firm's name was included among the sponsors in the official ICAI circular and event signage. CSR Activity by Partner: One of the partners, CA Anjali Taneja, personally financed a Clean Water Drive under her company's CSR initiative. The posters and banners displayed the following: "An initiative supported by CA Anjali Taneja (Partner, Arora & Taneja)" [Firm's logo was displayed at the bottom corner of the banner] Analyse the professional and ethical implications of the above situations in light of the ICAI Code of Ethics.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 refers to professional misconduct of a member in practice if he solicits client or professional work either directly or indirectly, by circular, advertisement, or personal communication or interview or by any other means. There are some forms of soliciting work which the council has prohibited, which includes Sponsoring Activities: Member in practice or a Firm of Chartered Accountants is not permitted to sponsor an event. However, such member or Firm may sponsor an event conducted by a Programme Organizing Unit (PoU) of the ICAI, provided such event has the prior approval of Continuing Professional Education (CPE) Directorate of the ICAI.Members sponsoring activities relating to Corporate Social Responsibility may mention their individual name with the prefix "CA". However, the mention of Firm name or CA Logo is not permitted. In the given situation, M/s. Arora & Taneja, a firm of Chartered Accountants, contributed funds to the "Financial Reporting Update Seminar" organized by one Program Organising Unit of the ICAI with prior approval from the CPE Directorate. Therefore, M/s Arora & Taneja shall not be held guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 since member or firm may sponsor an event conducted by a Programme Organizing Unit (PoU) of the ICAI with the prior approval of Continuing Professional Education (CPE) Directorate. In the given situation, CA Anjali Taneja, a partner of firm who personally financed a clean water drive under her company's CSR initiative, displayed the name, designation and Firm Logo in the posters and banners at the bottom corner of the banner. Therefore, she will be held guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (6) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 as members sponsoring activities relating to CSR may mention their individual name with the prefix “CA” but mention of Firm name or CA Logo is not permitted.
Topics: Professional Ethics & Liabilities of Auditors
Related Questions in this Topic
- Dheer & Co., a sole proprietary Chartered Accountancy firm, has its office in a busy commercial area of the city. Since ...
- CA Ajeet, a Chartered Accountant in practice, was appointed as the statutory auditor of Climax Manufacturing Limited. Af...
- PN and Associates are appointed as the Statutory Auditors of The Iron Company Ltd. The Central Government holds 65% of t...
- M/s M & T, a firm of Chartered Accountants having three partners, has been actively involved in professional development...
- M/s GAME & Co., a firm of Chartered Accountants, recently launched its official website "Game-ca.com". The website featu...