List out the entities which were covered under Phase I & II under the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules 2015 as notified by the MCA…
CA Final · Financial Reporting · MTP · November 2026
List out the entities which were covered under Phase I & II under the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules 2015 as notified by the MCA along with the specific date of coverage with its exclusions, if any. OR Explain how enhancing qualitative characteristics can improve the usefulness of financial information.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Either MCA has notified the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015. Accordingly, it has notified 39 Ind AS and has laid down mandatory Ind AS transition roadmap for companies and non- banking finance companies excluding banking companies and insurance companies under following two phases: Phase I Following companies were covered under Phase I for accounting periods beginning on or after 1st April 2016, with the comparatives for the periods ending on 31st March 2016: (a) companies whose equity or debt securities are listed or are in the process of being listed on any stock exchange in India or outside India and having net worth of rupees five hundred crore or more; (b) companies other than those covered by sub-clause (a) above and having net worth of rupees five hundred crore or more; (c) holding, subsidiary, joint venture or associate companies of companies covered by sub-clause (a) and sub-clause (b) as mentioned above. Phase II Following companies were covered under Phase II for accounting periods beginning on or after 1st April 2017, with the comparatives for the periods ending on 31st March 2017: (a) companies whose equity or debt securities are listed or are in the process of being listed on any stock exchange in India or outside India and having net worth of less than rupees five hundred crore; (b) companies other than those covered in sub-clause (a) above i.e. unlisted companies having net worth of rupees two hundred and fifty crore or more but less than rupees five hundred crore. (c) holding, subsidiary, joint venture or associate companies of companies covered by sub-clause (a) and sub-clause (b) as mentioned above. Exclusions: The roadmap shall not be applicable to companies whose securities are listed or are in the process of being listed on SME without initial public offering in accordance with the provisions of SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009. Ind AS would not be applicable to companies other than listed companies whose net worth is less than ₹ 250 crores and they will continue to follow AS. However, they can voluntary adopt Ind AS any time. OR / Alternative Solution: The usefulness of financial information is enhanced if it is comparable, verifiable, timely and understandable. 1. Comparability: Information about a reporting entity is more useful if it can be compared with similar information about other entities and with similar information about the same entity for another period or another date. Comparability refers to the use of the same methods for the same items, and uniformity implies that like things must look alike and different things must look different. 2. Verifiability: Verifiability means that different knowledgeable and independent observers could reach a consensus, although not necessarily complete agreement, that a particular depiction is a faithful representation. 3. Timeliness: Timeliness means having information available to decision-makers in time to be capable of influencing their decisions. Generally, the older the information is the less useful it is. However, some information may continue to be timely long after the end of a reporting period because some users may need to identify and assess trends. 4. Understandability: Classifying, characterising and presenting information clearly and concisely makes it understandable. Enhancing qualitative characteristics should be maximised to the extent possible. However, the enhancing qualitative characteristics, either individually or as a group, cannot make information useful if that information is irrelevant or does not provide a faithful representation of what it purports to represent. Sometimes, one enhancing qualitative characteristic may have to be diminished to maximise another qualitative characteristic. For example, a temporary reduction in comparability as a result of prospectively applying a new Ind AS may be worthwhile to improve relevance or faithful representation in the longer term. Appropriate disclosures may partially compensate for non-comparability.
Topics: General, General
Related Questions in this Topic
- Nova Retail Ltd. (NRL), a listed company, entered into a 5-year lease for a retail premises on 1 April 20X1, with an opt...
- CA. Rohan, an employee of Delta Ltd., discovers that the CFO has instructed him to capitalise a routine repair expense o...
- Sunrise Apparels Ltd. (SAL) is a listed textile manufacturing company with three subsidiaries located in Tamil Nadu, Guj...
- Company A has taken a long-term loan from Company B. In the month of December 20X1, there was a breach of material provi...
- A Ltd. purchases ₹ 10 lakh, 10%, five-year government bonds on 1 April 20X5, with semi-annual interest payable on 30 Sep...