Vertex Consumer Holdings Ltd. is a listed financial services group with a wholly-owned NBFC subsidiary, Vertex Capital Pvt. Ltd. Devraj & Co.,…

CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · MTP · November 2026
Vertex Consumer Holdings Ltd. is a listed financial services group with a wholly-owned NBFC subsidiary, Vertex Capital Pvt. Ltd. Devraj & Co., Chartered Accountants, are the statutory auditors of the group for the financial year 2025-26, with the engagement led by CA Kabir. During substantive testing of inventory at one of Vertex's operating subsidiaries, the engagement team identifies a pattern of indicators — including inventory count sheets with suspicious alterations, a senior operations manager who was unusually insistent on personally supervising the year-end physical count at a specific warehouse, and a spike in reported closing stock in the final week of the financial year unsupported by corresponding purchase or production records — suggesting that the manager may have deliberately inflated inventory quantities to boost the subsidiary's reported profitability ahead of a planned internal performance review. On being briefed on these indicators, the Board of Vertex Consumer Holdings Ltd. decides to commission an independent forensic accountant to conduct a focused investigation exclusively into this allegation, running as a parallel but separate exercise alongside Devraj & Co.'s ongoing statutory audit of the FY 2025-26 financial statements. As part of its statutory disclosures, Vertex Consumer Holdings Ltd. publishes a Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) in which it represents, under Principle 5 (Human Rights) of the National Guidelines on Responsible Business Conduct, that all loan proposals processed by the company are screened under a self-declared ‘responsible lending' policy that excludes financing to any borrower business found to be involved in child labour practices, and that this screening is embedded as a mandatory step in the loan sanctioning workflow. However, during a review of internal audit records for the year, the engagement team discovers that this screening step has, in practice, not been applied to any loan proposal processed over the past six months, because the compliance officer position responsible for conducting the screening has remained vacant since a resignation, with no interim arrangement made to cover this control activity. During one of several remote/digital audit sessions conducted over video call with Vertex's CFO to walk through the group's management information system, a member of the audit team, without seeking or obtaining prior authorization from the CFO or anyone else at Vertex, takes a screenshot of a confidential internal MIS dashboard displayed on screen, including granular, entity-wise profitability and cash-flow projections not otherwise shared with the audit team in documented form. The team member subsequently saves this screenshot on his personal laptop, intending to refer to it later while preparing his working papers, rather than uploading it to the firm's secured audit documentation system. During the consolidation process for the Consolidated Financial Statements, the engagement team notes that intra-group loan balances outstanding between Vertex Consumer Holdings Ltd. (the parent) and Vertex Capital Pvt. Ltd. (its wholly-owned NBFC subsidiary), comprising a loan of ₹ 15 crore extended by the parent to the subsidiary during the year, have not been eliminated on consolidation, resulting in an overstatement of both consolidated assets and consolidated liabilities by ₹ 15 crore. The engagement team assesses this misstatement as material to the Consolidated Financial Statements, though not pervasive. When the matter is raised with the CFO for correction, management refuses to pass the elimination entry, arguing that since the loan appears as both a receivable and a payable within the group, ‘it nets off in aggregate group profitability anyway.' Separately, and unrelated to the audit fieldwork itself, it comes to the attention of the firm's ethics committee that a senior partner of Devraj & Co., not part of the Vertex engagement team, has accepted a referral fee from an investment bank in consideration for recommending Vertex Consumer Holdings Ltd. to the bank as a potential client for a prospective equity fundraising mandate the bank was seeking to pitch for. This arrangement was never disclosed to Vertex's Audit Committee or to the engagement partner, CA Kabir, and came to light only when the investment bank referenced the 'introduction fee arrangement' in an unrelated email later forwarded internally within Devraj & Co. Based on the above facts, answer the following MCQs:
(A) Both share the identical objective of opining on the financial statements as a whole.
(B) The statutory audit is limited to spotting fraud indicators, never establishing facts.
(C) The forensic investigation replaces the need for further SA 240 procedures this year.
(D) The forensic review targets the specific fraud allegation's facts, while the audit's objective remains overall reasonable assurance under SA 240.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Correct Answer: Option (D)

The forensic review targets the specific fraud allegation's facts, while the audit's objective remains overall reasonable assurance under SA 240.
Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic