Mr. X of Haryana intends to start business of supply of building material to various construction sites in Haryana. He has taken voluntary…

CA Intermediate · Taxation · MTP · September 2026
Mr. X of Haryana intends to start business of supply of building material to various construction sites in Haryana. He has taken voluntary registration under GST in the month of April. However, he has not commenced the business till December due to lack of working capital. The proper officer suo-motu cancelled the registration of Mr. X. You are required to examine whether the action taken by proper officer is valid in law? Mr. X has applied for revocation of cancellation of registration after 4 months from the date of service of the order of cancellation of registration. Department contends that in any case, application for revocation of cancellation of registration can only be made within 90 days from the date of service of the order of cancellation of registration. However, Mr. X contends that the period of submission of application may be extended on sufficient grounds being shown. You are required to comment upon the validity of contentions raised by Department and Mr. X.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

The proper officer may cancel the registration of a person from such date, including any retrospective date, as he may deem fit, where, inter alia, -any person who has taken voluntary registration has not commenced business within six months from the date of registration. Thus, suo-motu cancellation of registration of Mr. X by proper officer is valid in law since Mr. X, a voluntarily registered person, has not commenced his business within 6 months from the date of registration. Further, where the registration of a person is cancelled suo-motu by the proper officer, such registered person may apply for revocation of the cancellation to such proper officer, within 90 days from the date of service of the order of cancellation of registration. However, said period of 90 days may, on sufficient cause being shown and for reasons to be recorded in writing, be extended by the Commissioner or an officer authorised by him in this behalf, not below the rank of Additional Commissioner/Joint Commissioner, as the case may be, for a further period not exceeding 180 days Thus, considering the above provisions, the contention of Department is not valid in law as extension can be sought in the prescribed time limit for revocation of cancellation of registration. The contention raised by Mr. X is valid in law as extension in time limit is allowed on sufficient cause being shown and for reasons to be recorded in writing.

Topics: Paper 3B: Goods and Services Tax

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic