Answer the following with respect to AS 18: (i) ABC Ltd. sold goods of ₹ 2,00,000 to its associate company for the 1stquarter ending 30.06.2025.…

CA Intermediate · Advanced Accounting · MTP · September 2026
Answer the following with respect to AS 18: (i) ABC Ltd. sold goods of ₹ 2,00,000 to its associate company for the 1stquarter ending 30.06.2025. After that the related party relationship ceased to exist. However, goods were supplied to any other ordinary customer. Decide whether transactions of the entire year have to be disclosed as related party transaction. (ii) If the majority of directors of Arjun Ltd. constitute the majority of the Board of another Company Bheem Ltd. in their individual capacity as professionals (and not by virtue of their being Directors in Arjun Ltd.). Are both the companies related? (iii) Asha Ltd. sells all the manufactured furniture of ₹ 1,00,00,000 to Sasha Ltd, as per agreement. Sasha Ltd. is the only customer to Asha Ltd. In the financial statements, Asha Ltd. wants to present Sasha company as a related party. Comment on the disclosure requirement.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

(i) As per AS 18, parties are considered to be related if any time during the reporting period one party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party. Transactions of ABC Ltd. with its associate company for the first quarter ending 30.06.2025 only are required to be disclosed as related party transactions as the company has the ability to exercise significant influence only till 30.6.2025. The transactions for the period in which related party relationship did not exist need not be reported. (ii) In the given case, Arjun Ltd. cannot be said to control the composition of board of directors of Bheem Ltd. as the directors have been appointed in their individual capacity as professionals and not by virtue of their being directors in Arjun Ltd. Hence, it cannot be concluded that the companies are related merely because the majority of the directors of one company became the majority of the directors of the second in their individual capacity as professionals. (iii) In the context of AS 18, a single customer, supplier, franchiser, distributor, or general agent with whom an enterprise transacts a significant volume of business cannot be construed as Related Party Relationship merely by virtue of the resulting economic dependence. There is an economic dependence between the companies but no one controls or exercise significant influence on the other. In the given case, Asha Ltd. need not report Sasha Company as its related party in its financial statements.

Topics: AS 18

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic