(i) "Whether a group of persons is or is not a firm, or whether a person is or is not a partner in a firm." Explain the mode of determining…
CA Foundation · Business Laws · MTP · September 2026
(i) "Whether a group of persons is or is not a firm, or whether a person is or is not a partner in a firm." Explain the mode of determining existence of partnership as per the Indian Partnership Act, 1932? (4 Marks) (ii) Discuss the provisions regarding personal profits earned by a partner under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932? (2 Marks)
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Provisions of Law: (i) Mode of determining existence of partnership (Section 6 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932): In determining whether a group of persons is or is not a firm, or whether a person is or not a partner in a firm, regard shall be had to the real relation between the parties, as shown by all relevant facts taken together. For determining the existence of partnership, it must be proved. There was an agreement between all the persons concerned The agreement was to share the profits of a business and the business was carried on by all or any of them acting for all. Agreement: Partnership is created by agreement and not by status (Section 5). The relation of partnership arises from contract and not from status; and in particular, the members of a Hindu Undivided family carrying on a family business as such are not partners in such business. Sharing of Profit: Sharing of profit is an essential element to constitute a partnership. But, it is only a prima facie evidence and not conclusive evidence, in that regard. The sharing of profits or of gross returns accruing from property by persons holding joint or common interest in the property would not by itself make such persons partners. Although the right to participate in profits is a strong test of partnership, and there may be cases where, upon a simple participation in profits, there is a partnership, yet whether the relation does or does not exist must depend upon the whole contract between the parties. Agency: Existence of Mutual Agency which is the cardinal principle of partnership law, is very much helpful in reaching a conclusion in this regard. Each partner carrying on the business is the principal as well as an agent of other partners. So, the act of one partner done on behalf of firm, binds all the partners. If the elements of mutual agency relationship exist between the parties constituting a group formed with a view to earn profits by running a business, a partnership may be deemed to exist. (ii) Personal Profit earned by Partners (Section 16 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932) According to section 16, subject to contract between the partners: (a) If a partner derives any profit for himself from any transaction of the firm, or from the use of the property or business connection of the firm or the firm name, he shall account for that profit and pay it to the firm; (b) If a partner carries on any business of the same nature and competing with that of the firm, he shall account for and pay to the firm all profits made by him in that business.
Topics: The Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Related Questions in this Topic
- A, B and C are partners in an unregistered partnership firm named M/s ABC & Associates. Is the suit maintainable in the ...
- Mr. Ram and Mr. Rakesh are working as teachers in Ishwarchand Vidhyasagar Higher Secondary School and also are very good...
- Ram and Sarthak are partners in a partnership firm styled as RS & Co. (the firm). Gopal, a renowned businessman, is thei...
- With reference to the provisions of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 explain the various effects of insolvency of a partner.
- "Partner indeed virtually embraces the character of both a principal and an agent". Describe the said statement keeping ...