RECOMMEND how the discontinued operation pertaining to Suraksha Constructions was measured and presented in Aadhya Ltd.’s consolidated financial…

CA Final · Integrated Business Solutions (Multidisciplinary Case Study) · MTP · November 2024
RECOMMEND how the discontinued operation pertaining to Suraksha Constructions was measured and presented in Aadhya Ltd.’s consolidated financial statements: 1. On the acquisition date. 2. On the reporting date of the divestment.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Guidance from standard: Ind AS 105 defines a disposal group as a group of assets to be disposed of, by sale or otherwise, together as a group in a single transaction, alongwith liabilities directly associated with those assets that will be transferred in the transaction. The group includes goodwill acquired in a business combination if the group is a cash-generating unit to which goodwill has been allocated in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs 80-87 of Ind AS 36, Impairment of Assets, or if it is an operation within such a cash-generating unit. Analysis and Conclusion: In the given case, Suraksha Constructions was acquired exclusively with a view to sell. Hence, it meets the criteria to be classified as a discontinued operation. The discontinued operation would be measured in accordance with paragraphs 15 and 16 of Ind AS 105. As per para 15, an entity shall measure a non-current asset (or disposal group) classified as held for sale at the lower of its carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. As per para 16, if a newly acquired asset (or disposal group) meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale (see paragraph 11), applying paragraph 15 will result in the asset (or disposal group) being measured on initial recognition at the lower of its carrying amount had it not been so classified (for example, cost) and fair value less costs to sell. Hence, if the asset (or disposal group) is acquired as part of a business combination, it shall be measured at fair value less costs to sell. Therefore, on acquisition date, in line with paragraph 16, Aadhya Ltd. would have measured Suraksha Constructions as a disposal group at fair value less costs to sell which would have been calculated by Adhya Ltd. as: Fair value of total assets excluding liabilities on acquisition – Costs to sell = 3,060 Crores -48 Crores = 3,012 Crores. Fair value of liabilities on acquisition= 510 Crores. At the reporting date, in line with paragraph 15, Aadhya Ltd. would have remeasured the disposal group at the lower of its cost and fair value less costs to sell, which would have been calculated by Adhya Ltd. as: Fair value of total assets excluding liabilities on subsequent reporting date – Costs to sell = 3,000 Crores -48 Crores = 2,952 Crores Fair value of liabilities on reporting date = 528 Crores. At the reporting date, Aadhya Ltd. would have presented these assets and liabilities separately from other assets and liabilities in its consolidated financial statements. In the statement of profit and loss, Aadhya Ltd. would have recognized loss on subsequent measurement to fair value less cost to sale of the disposal group i.e. Suraksha Constructions, which equals 60crores (3,060 Crores -3,000 Crores).
Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic