Aurex Global Industries Ltd. imported certain machinery, and the customs authorities passed an assessment order determining the duty payable. Aurex…
CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · RTP · May 2026
Aurex Global Industries Ltd. imported certain machinery, and the customs authorities passed an assessment order determining the duty payable. Aurex Global Industries Ltd. was of the view that excess duty had been levied due to an incorrect classification adopted in the assessment order. However, Aurex Global Industries Ltd. paid the duty under protest. Subsequently, the company filed a refund application contending that the duty had been wrongly assessed and excess duty had been collected. With reference to the principles laid down in a decided case law, if any, examine whether the refund claim filed by Aurex Global Industries Ltd. is maintainable in law.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
No, the refund claim filed by Aurex Global Industries Ltd. is not maintainable in law. In the case of Priya Blue Industries Limited v. CCus. (Preventive) 2004 (172) ELT 145 (SC), Supreme Court ruled that unless an assessment order has been reviewed and/or modified in an appeal, that assessment order stands. Duty is payable only as per that assessment order. A refund claim is not an appeal proceeding. Further, the officer considering the refund claim, cannot review the assessment order. Thus, refund claims based on challenge to an order of assessment are liable to be rejected. In view of the above ruling of the Supreme Court, refund claims based on challenge to an order of assessment are liable to be rejected. Appeal should be filed and not a refund claim when adjudication order has been issued or even when self-assessment is made. An adjudication order should be appealed against, if assessee is aggrieved by adjudication order. The order cannot be challenged by filing refund application.
Topics: Customs: Refund
Related Questions in this Topic
- Section 26A of the Customs Act, 1962 provides that the import duty paid on clearance of imported goods for home consumpt...
- M/s ABC has imported some goods from London and cleared for home consumption. The same were finally re-assessed u/s 18(2...
- Mr. Jatin, an importer, had made provisional payment of customs duty of 2,00,000 under section 18 of the Customs Act, 19...
- ABC Pvt. Ltd. exported a consignment of goods to M/s George, located in France in January, 2024 and paid applicable expo...
- Section 26A of the Customs Act, 1962 provides that the import duty paid on clearance of imported goods for home consumpt...