Vedant Ltd. (hereinafter referred as “company”) is a conglomerate having diversified businesses including hotels, FMCG (Fast-Moving Consumer Goods),…

CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · MTP · September 2025
Vedant Ltd. (hereinafter referred as “company”) is a conglomerate having diversified businesses including hotels, FMCG (Fast-Moving Consumer Goods), information technology etc. It has its corporate office in Delhi and operations across multiple States in India. As an internal policy, the company has obtained single GST registration in each State irrespective of the diversified business operations being undertaken in the State. During the month of April, the company undertook the following transactions: (a) The FMCG division of the company in Jaipur, Rajasthan agreed to use the vacant godown within the premises of Hotel Division in Udaipur, Rajasthan for storage of its goods. The value of such an arrangement was agreed at 5 lakh per month. Said amount was agreed to be adjusted by way of intra-division book adjustment on a monthly basis. (b) The Hotel Division of the company in Maharashtra used the IT platform owned and managed by the IT Division of the company in Delhi. The value of such services was determined as 12 lakh per month. The IT division treated the same as deemed supply liable to GST as per Schedule I of the CGST Act, 2017 and charged GST on such deemed supply in the invoice issued to Hotel Division on 25th April. The Hotel Division availed the input tax credit of such deemed supplies from its Maharashtra Office in April itself. However, no payment was made for such services by the Hotel Division to the IT Division. (c) The Executive Director, as part of his salary and perquisites under the employment agreement, was eligible for a voucher worth 5 lakh, redeemable at any hotel property of the company in India. The voucher was used by the Executive Director for the stay of his family in a company owned hotel in Udaipur, Rajasthan. The total amount charged from the Executive Director was 25 lakh. The voucher value of 5 lakh was deducted from such amount at the time of payment. (d) The Hotel Division provided accommodation services to a US citizen and resident for a wedding ceremony organized at its hotel in Udaipur, Rajasthan. The total amount of 2 crores for such services was paid by an Indian individual residing in Delhi on behalf of the US resident in Indian currency. The amount was received by the Mumbai, Maharashtra Office of Hotel Division. (e) The company received long term lease of an industrial plot from Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) in auction against payment of an upfront amount as lease premium of 20 crores for a period of 50 years. The company paid location charges of 5 crores in addition to the said premium. The rate of GST in case of intra-State supplies, unless otherwise provided shall be 9% CGST and 9% SGST) and for inter-State supplies shall be 18% IGST. All the divisions of the Company are eligible for 100% input tax credit unless otherwise specified.
(A) The Hotel Division shall charge CGST and SGST amounting to 45,000 each in the tax invoice issued to FMCG Division.
(B) No GST is chargeable on usage of vacant godown of Hotel Division.
(C) The Hotel Division shall charge IGST amounting to 90,000 in the tax invoice issued to FMCG Division.
(D) The Hotel Division, Rajasthan shall charge IGST amounting to 90,000 in the tax invoice issued to Corporate Office in Delhi.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Correct Answer: Option (B)

No GST is chargeable on usage of vacant godown of Hotel Division.

Topics: Input Tax Credit, Place of Supply, Value of Supply

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic