In an appeal filed with the High Court by Prateek Ltd., on the question whether activity undertaken by Prateek Ltd. amounts to supply, the appeal…
CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · RTP · May 2025
In an appeal filed with the High Court by Prateek Ltd., on the question whether activity undertaken by Prateek Ltd. amounts to supply, the appeal was decided in favour of Prateek Ltd. The amount of tax, interest and penalty involved were IGST of 1.2 crore, interest of 60 lakh and penalty of 50 lakh. However, the Department does not agree with the order passed by the High Court and contends that the said activity amounts to supply under GST. The Department wants to file an appeal before the Supreme Court relating to the dispute pertaining to demand of tax, interest and penalty. You are required to examine whether appeal can be filed by the Department in the given case. Will your answer change, in case matter is related to valuation of services instead of determining whether the said activity amounts to supply?
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Section 120 of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that the Board may, on the recommendations of the Council, from time to time, issue orders or instructions or directions fixing such monetary limits, as it may deem fit, for the purposes of regulating the filing of appeal or application by the officer of the central tax under the provisions of this Chapter. CBIC vide Circular No. 207/1/2024 GST dated 26.06. 2024 has fixed the following monetary limits for filing appeals/ applications/ Special Leave Petition by the Department before GSTAT, High Courts and Supreme Court subject to specified exclusions: Appellate forum Monetary limit (Amount involved in ₹) GSTAT 20 lakh High Court 1 crore Supreme Court 2 crore Further, where the dispute pertains to demand of tax (with or without penalty and/or interest), the aggregate of the amount of tax in dispute (including CGST, SGST/UTGST, IGST and Compensation Cess) only shall be considered while applying the monetary limit for filing appeal, viz.1.2 crore (amount of tax only) in the given case. Thus, appeal cannot be filed by the Department to Supreme Court in the given case as the amount involved as per the circular does not exceed the monetary limit of 2crore. However, the circular further provides that the monetary limits specified above for filing appeal or application by the Department before GSTAT or High Court and for filing Special Leave Petition or appeal before the Supreme Court shall not be applicable in the following circumstances where the decision to file appeal shall be taken on merits irrespective of the said monetary limits: Where any provision of the CGST Act or SGST/UTGST Act or IGST Act or GST (Compensation to States) Act has been held to be ultra vires to the Constitution of India; orWhere any rules or regulations made under the CGST Act or SGST/UTGST Act or IGST Act or GST (Compensation to States) Act have been held to be ultra vires the parent Act; orWhere any order, notification, instruction, or circular issued by the Government or the Board has been held to be ultra vires of the CGST Act or SGST/UTGST Act or IGST Act or GST (Compensation to States) Act or the rules made thereunder; orWhere the matter is related to - valuation of goods or services; orclassification of goods or services; orrefunds; orplace of supply; orany other issue, which is recurring in nature and/or involves interpretation of the provisions of the GST law/ the Rules/ notification/ circular/order/ instruction etc.; orWhere strictures/adverse comments have been passed and/or cost has been imposed against the Government/Department or their officers; orAny other case or class of cases, where in the opinion of the Board, it is necessary to contest in the interest of justice or revenue. In view of the above, if the given case the matter is related to valuation of services, appeal can be filed by the Department to the Supreme Court based on the merits irrespective of the monetary limits.
Topics: Appeals and Revision
Related Questions in this Topic
- Under what circumstances, the Revisional Authority (RA) cannot exercise the powers of revision under section 108 of the ...
- M/s Truthful Limited was issued show cause notice under section 74A of the CGST Act, 2017 by the Adjudicating Authority ...
- 'Generally, appellants are not allowed to produce any additional evidence at the appeal stage.' Examine this statement w...
- Shivam Tools Limited filed an appeal before the First Appellate Authority (AA) against order of the proper officer under...
- On 15th October 2025, Jai Laxmi Exim Limited was served with a demand order by the Revisional Authority (RA) of GST for ...