Mr. T imported certain goods from a related person Mr. R of US and transaction value has been rejected. Rules 4 and 5 of the Valuation…
CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · MTP · May 2024
Mr. T imported certain goods from a related person Mr. R of US and transaction value has been rejected. Rules 4 and 5 of the Valuation (Determination of value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 are found inapplicable as no similar/ identical goods are imported in India. Mr. T furnishes cost related data of imports and requests customs authorities to determine value accordingly as per rule 8 of the Customs Valuation (Determination of value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007. The relevant data are Cost of materials incurred by Mr. R $ 2000Fabrication charges incurred by Mr. R $ 1000Other chargeable expenses incurred by Mr. R $ 400Other indirect costs incurred by Mr. R $ 250Freight from Mr. R 's factory to US port $ 250Loading charges at US port $ 100Normal net profit margin of Mr. R is 20% of FOBAir freight from US port to Indian port $ 1,500Insurance from US port to Indian port $ 50Exchange rate 70 per $ The customs authorities are of the opinion that since value as per rule 7 of the Customs Valuation (Determination of value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 can be determined at 4,00,000, there is no need to apply rule 8 of the Customs Valuation (Determination of value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007. Can the request of Mr. T be legally acceptable? If so, compute the assessable value under the Customs Act, 1962.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
(a) The value of the imported goods is determined under rule 8 of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as Import Valuation Rules) if the same cannot be determined under the earlier rules. However, the order of application of rules 7 and 8 can be reversed at the request of the importer and with the approval of the proper officer. Thus, request of Mr. T for determination of value under rule 8 is legally acceptable, if the same is also approved by the proper officer. Assuming that the request of Mr. T has been approved by the proper officer, the assessable value of the imported goods under rule 8 will be the sum of- (a) the cost of materials and fabrication or other processing; (b) an amount for profit and general expenses (c) the cost or value of all other expenses under rule 10(2) of the said rules. Computation of assessable value Particulars Amount ($) Cost of materials 2,000 Add: Fabrication charges 1,000 Other chargeable expenses 400 Other indirect costs 250 Cost of the goods at Mr. R's factory 3,650 Add: Net profit margin @ 20% of FOB, i.e. 25% of total cost 1,000 Total cost till US port = Cost of the goods at factory +Freight from factory to US port and loading charges at US port = $ 4,000 [$ 3,650 + $ 250 + $ 100] FOB value = Total cost till port + profit = $ 5,000 ($ 4,000 +$ 1,000) Add: Freight & loading/unloading charges 1,000 [In case of import by air, the cost of transport, loading, unloading and handling charges associated with the delivery of the imported goods to the place of importation are restricted to 20% of FOB value] Insurance charges 50 Assessable value 5,700 Assessable value in Indian Rupees (Exchange rate -70 per $) 3,99,000
Topics: Customs: Valuation under the Customs Act, 1962
Related Questions in this Topic
- A machinery part was sent abroad for repairs under a free warranty, so the foreign repairer charged nothing. Its fair co...
- Foreign Trade International Ltd. has imported one machine from England. It has given the following particulars: Sr. ...
- Mr. Harrison of foreign origin has come on travel visa, to tour in India. He carries with him, as part of baggage, the f...
- David Ltd. is the manufacturer of semi-conductors in the State of Gujarat. It imported machinery by air from France for ...
- Bharti Company imported goods valued at 10,00,000 vide a Bill of Entry presented before the proper officer on 15 th Jul...