Tide Ltd., an assessee, has sold goods on 12.01.2026 to Limitless Ltd., located in notified jurisdictional area (NJA), for 9.50 crores. During the…
CA Final · Direct Tax Laws and International Taxation · MTP · May 2026
Tide Ltd., an assessee, has sold goods on 12.01.2026 to Limitless Ltd., located in notified jurisdictional area (NJA), for 9.50 crores. During the current financial year, Tide Ltd. charged - 10.50 crores from XY Inc. of Country X and 11 crores from RP Inc. of Country Y for sale of identical goods and both of which are neither associated enterprise of Tide Ltd. nor they are situated in any NJA. While sales to XY Inc. and RP Inc. were on CIF basis, the sale to Limitless Ltd., was on FOB basis, which paid ocean freight and insurance amounting to 20 lakhs on purchases from Tide Ltd. If sales to XY Inc. and RP Inc. are made on FOB basis, the cost of freight, insurance would amount to 18 lakhs. The assessee has a policy of providing after-sales support service to the tune of 13 lakhs to all customers except Limitless Ltd. which procured the same locally at a cost of 17 lakhs. Compute the ALP for the sales made to Limitless Ltd., and the amount of consequent increase, if any, in the profit of the assessee-company.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
A transaction where one of the parties thereto is a person located in a NJA would be deemed to be an international transaction and all parties to the transaction would be deemed as associated enterprises. Accordingly, all the provisions of transfer pricing would be attracted in case of such a transaction. Hence, the transactions between Tide Ltd, an Indian company and Limitless Ltd., located in NJA, would be deemed to be international transactions between associated enterprises. The transactions of Tide Ltd. with XY Inc. of Country X and RP Inc. of Country Y for sale of identical goods are comparable uncontrolled international transactions, since they are neither associated enterprises of Tide Ltd. nor are they situated in NJA. Hence, Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method can be used to determine ALP. Where more than one price is determined by the most appropriate method, CUP method in this case, then, the arithmetic mean has to be taken in cases where the number of entries in the dataset is less than 6 (in this case it is only 2). Moreover, the benefit of permissible variation between the ALP and the transfer price based on the rate notified by the Central Government (i.e., maximum of 3% of transaction price) would not be available in respect of such transaction. Computation of ALP using CUP method Particulars XY Inc. ₹ in crores RP Inc. ₹ in crores Price charged by Tide Ltd. (on CIF basis) 10.50 11.00 Less: Ocean freight and insurance, has to be reduced since the price charged to Limitless Ltd. is on FOB basis 0.18 0.18 10.32 10.82 Less: Cost of after-sales support service (has to be reduced, since such services are being provided to XY Inc. and RP Inc. but not to Limitless Ltd.) 0.13 0.13 Arm's Length Price 10.19 10.69 Arithmetic mean of the above prices [(₹ 10.19 crores +10.69 crores)/2] = 10.44 crores Less: Price at which goods were sold to Limitless Ltd. = 9.50 crores Arm's length adjustment [increase in profit of Tide Ltd.] = 0.94 crores
Topics: Transfer Pricing
Related Questions in this Topic
- PG Ltd., an Indian Company, has borrowed ₹ 90 crores on 01-04-2025 from M/s. Capital Inc, a company incorporated in Lond...
- (I) Xylo Ltd., operating in India, is the dealer for the goods manufactured by Yoyo Ltd. of Japan. Yoyo Ltd. owns 55% sh...
- Euphoric Ltd. having its registered office in Chennai is engaged in multiple businesses. It buys mobile phones from its ...
- M/s Alpha Investments Ltd., an investment company, held 2,00,000 shares of Beta Alloys Ltd. as stock-in-trade. Pursuant ...
- Trex Ltd., an Indian Company, on 01-04-2024 has borrowed 90 crores from M/s Refine Inc, a Company incorporated in Countr...