M/s RH Steels Ltd. is a company incorporated in India. It sets up two units, one in a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) and another in non-SEZ area for…
CA Final · Direct Tax Laws and International Taxation · PYQS · May 2025
M/s RH Steels Ltd. is a company incorporated in India. It sets up two units, one in a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) and another in non-SEZ area for manufacturing of steel bottles. The company transfers the product of non-SEZ unit to SEZ unit at a price lower than the fair market value. In respect of such products transferred from non-SEZ unit, only insignificant manufacturing activity takes place in the SEZ unit. In this way, the company is able to show higher profits in SEZ unit than in non-SEZ unit, and consequently claims higher deduction in computation of income. The sales from bottles transferred from non-SEZ unit constitute 15% of the total turnover of SEZ unit. Can provisions of GAAR be invoked?
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
M/s RH Steels Ltd. has tried to take advantage of tax provisions by diverting profits from non-SEZ unit to SEZ unit. This is not the intention of the SEZ legislation. However, such tax avoidance is specifically dealt with through the provisions contained in section 10AA (9) , as per which provisions of section 80-IA (8) would get attracted in such a case. Further, if the aggregate of such transactions entered into in the relevant previous year exceed the threshold of 20crore, domestic transfer pricing regulations under section 92BA would be attracted. Thus, in this case, due to application of specific anti-avoidance provisions, no tax benefit can be derived by M/ RH Steels Ltd. by transferring the products from non-SEZ unit to SEZ unit at less than fair market value. Hence, the Revenue need not invoke GAAR in such a case, though GAAR and SAAR can co-exist as per clarification given in the CBDT Circular.
Topics: Provisions to Counteract Unethical Tax Practices
Related Questions in this Topic
- In the following independent circumstances, discuss whether the provisions of GAAR would be applicable: (I) Alphabet Inc...
- RST Inc, a US company having its place of effective management also in the USA, has advanced a loan equivalent to 170 cr...
- ABC Ltd., operating in India, is the dealer for the goods manufactured by Ben Ltd. of Japan. Ben Ltd. owns 55% shares of...
- Dynasty Ltd., an Indian company, incorporates a wholly owned subsidiary Company C, in Country X which is a Low Tax Juris...
- In the following independent circumstances, discuss whether the provisions of GAAR would be applicable: R Inc., a compa...