Krishna Cooperative Society, the assessee is engaged in marketing of fertilizers and purchase and processing of seeds. The assessee had claimed…
CA Final · Direct Tax Laws and International Taxation · MTP · May 2024
Krishna Cooperative Society, the assessee is engaged in marketing of fertilizers and purchase and processing of seeds. The assessee had claimed deduction under section 80P(2)(d) on dividend income received from NAFED and one Cooperative bank and also on interest on deposits with Co-operative banks. The Assessing Officer contended that the aforesaid income were not included in the total income and wants to invoke section 14A by disallowing the expenditure incurred with respect to earning income which is not liable to income tax. Discuss whether the action taken by the Assessing Officer is tenable in law.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Issue Involved: The issue under consideration is whether the provisions of section 14A can be invoked in disallowing the expenditure incurred in respect of the income for which deduction is claimed under Chapter VI-A. Provisions applicable: As per section 14A, expenditure incurred in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under the Act, will not be allowed in computing the total income of the assessee. Analysis: Deduction under section 80P covered in Chapter VIA is different from the exclusions/exemptions provided under Chapter III. Section 14A is applicable only if an income is not included in the total income as per the provisions of Chapter III of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Income which qualifies for deductions under section 80C to 80U has to be first included in the gross total income of the assessee and then allowed as a deduction. Therefore, no disallowance can be made u/s 14A in respect of income included in total income in respect of which deduction is allowable u/s 80C to 80U. Conclusion: Accordingly, the action taken by the Assessing Officer in disallowing the expenditure incurred with respect to income for which deduction under Chapter VI-A is claimed, by invoking the provisions of section 14A is, therefore, not tenable in law. Note – The facts given in the question are similar to the facts in CIT v. Kribhco (2012) 349 ITR 0618, wherein the issue came up before the Delhi High Court. The above answer is based on the rationale of the Delhi High Court in the said case.
Topics: Case Laws
Related Questions in this Topic
- Mr. Manish's total income for the AY 24-25, as per return furnished under Section 139(1) is 45 lakhs. The assessment was...
- M/s XYZ Pvt. Ltd., aggrieved by the order of Appellate Tribunal, filed an appeal to the High Court. The High Court witho...
- AB Ltd. is a multinational company engaged in manufacturing and selling of soft drinks. For the AY 21-22, after being ag...
- Answer any two out of the following sub-parts viz (i), (ii) and (iii): (i) Mr. Arjun, a resident individual, electronic...
- AZ Foundation, trust registered u/s 12AB, runs an educational institution. The trust is paying rent of 30 lakhs per annu...