During the audit of the financial statements of Good Limited for the year ended March 31, 2025, CA Aryan, the statutory auditor, requested external…

CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · MTP · May 2026
During the audit of the financial statements of Good Limited for the year ended March 31, 2025, CA Aryan, the statutory auditor, requested external confirmation for certain trade receivables as part of audit procedures in accordance with SA 505: (i) CA Aryan sent a confirmation request to a debtor ABC Ltd. for balance of 16,75,000 which was outstanding for more than 6 months, insisting him to respond directly to the auditor, confirming whether they agree or disagree with the balance stated. (ii) He also sent a confirmation request to another debtor PQR Ltd. with an outstanding balance of 14,50,000 requesting a response only if there was a disagreement with the stated amount. CA Aryan received responses from the aforementioned debtors in following manner: ABC Ltd. confirmed that, as per their records, they owed - 15,40,000 to Good Limited instead of 16,75,000 as per the company's books.PQR Ltd. did not respond to the confirmation request. Identify and explain the type of confirmation request sent by CA Aryan to ABC Ltd. and PQR Ltd. Also, discuss the course of action CA Aryan should take for the discrepancy in the confirmation received from ABC Ltd. and non-receipt of confirmation from PQR Ltd.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Positive confirmation request: A request that the confirming party respond directly to the auditor indicating whether the confirming party agrees or disagrees with the information in the request or providing the requested information. Exception – A response that indicates a difference between information requested to be confirmed, or contained in the entity's records, and information provided by the confirming party. The exception needs to be assessed to the entire population after analyzing the reason for difference. In the given situation, the auditor has sent the positive confirmation request for the amount of 16,75,000 to a debtor ABC Ltd. which was outstanding for more than 6 months, however, due to difference between information requested to be confirmed, or contained in the entity's records (i.e.16,75,000), and information provided by the confirming party ABC Ltd. (i.e.15,40,000) is forming situation of exception confirmation. The auditor's evaluation, when taken into account with other audit procedures the auditor may have performed, may assist the auditor in concluding whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained or whether performing further audit procedures is necessary, as required by SA 330 in case a response is indicating an exception. The company should be asked to investigate and reconcile the discrepancy indicated by the confirming party. Negative confirmation request – A request that the confirming party respond directly to the auditor only if the confirming party disagrees. In the given case, the auditor has sent the negative confirmation request for 14,50,000 to another debtor PQR Ltd. Non- response by the PQR Ltd. implies that it agrees with the amount. Thus, CA Aryan is not required to take any action in this case.

Topics: Standard on Auditing (SA)

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic