You are appointed as Statutory Auditor of High Ltd. and are in the midst of conducting Audit for the financial year ending on 31st March, 2025.…
CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · MTP · May 2026
You are appointed as Statutory Auditor of High Ltd. and are in the midst of conducting Audit for the financial year ending on 31st March, 2025. During the course of audit, you come across a situation involving recording of purchases amounting to 1.30 crores from a company incorporated on 24th March, 2025. Upon further inquiry, you discovered that purchases have been booked at the instructions of one of the directors. Further, despite this entry in books, no payment was made and there is lack of documentary or other evidence validating these purported purchases. How would you deal in the given situation?
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
SA 240, "The Auditor's Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements," emphasize that fraud can be perpetrated by management override of controls, such as the creation of fictitious journal entries, particularly towards the end of an accounting period, to manipulate operating results or achieve specific objectives. In the case of High Ltd., where purchases of 1.30 crore were recorded at year-end without supporting evidence, it became apparent during the investigation that the company had entered fictitious journal entries to manipulate the operating results. Given this situation, the auditor would align their approach based on the impact of the misstatement resulting from such fictitious journal entries. If, due to fraud or suspected fraud, the auditor encounters exceptional circumstances that cast doubt on their ability to continue the audit, they must assess the professional and legal responsibilities applicable. This includes considering reporting obligations to those who appointed the auditor or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities. The appropriateness of withdrawal from the engagement is also a consideration, where legally permitted. Furthermore, the auditor is mandated to report in accordance with Section 143 (12) of the Companies Act, 2013. According to Section 143 (12) read with Rule 13 of Companies (Audit & Auditor's) Rules, 2014, if the auditor, during the performance of their duties, has reason to believe that an offence of fraud involving an amount of 1crore or more has been committed by the company's officers or employees, reporting to the Central Government is required in the prescribed manner. Additionally, reporting obligations extend to Clause (xi) of Paragraph 3 of Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2020. The auditor is obligated to disclose whether any fraud by the company or against the company by its officers or employees has been observed or reported during the year. If affirmative, the nature and amount involved are to be indicated. This comprehensive reporting framework ensures transparency, adherence to legal requirements, and protection of stakeholders' interests in the face of potential fraudulent activities.
Topics: Standard on Auditing (SA)
Related Questions in this Topic
- While assessing the impact of uncorrected misstatements in the audit of Super Builders Private Limited, Mr. Mahavir enco...
- CA Arjun, CA Bharat and CA Chirag have been appointed as joint auditors of BCA Ltd., a company having manufacturing unit...
- CA Puneet, engagement partner for the audit of a listed company, decided to use the work of the company's internal audit...
- Narayan & Co. is the statutory auditor of Joy Ltd., a company engaged in the tours and travel business. During the audit...
- Raja & Co., Chartered Accountants, are the statutory auditors of Rani Ltd., a listed company, for the year ended 31 Marc...