The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (C&AG) appointed M/s. VR & Associates, a firm of Chartered Accountants, to conduct the audit of…

CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · PYQS · January 2026
The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (C&AG) appointed M/s. VR & Associates, a firm of Chartered Accountants, to conduct the audit of Sunshine Ltd., a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) under the Government of India and intimated to the auditors about the following concerns in respect of the PSU. Sunshine Ltd. proposed to set up a solar panel manufacturing project in North Gujarat with an estimated cost of 5,750 crores, which included - 2,000 crores earmarked for Research and Development (R&D). While all approvals, documentation, and statutory requirements were duly complied with, the C&AG expressed concern that the proposed R&D expenditure appeared wasteful and lacking justification on the tests of public interest, as several established companies were already engaged in similar activities in that region. Identify the type of audit that the C&AG expects M/s. VR & Associates to conduct in this context. Also, explain the principles of this audit.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

The type of audit that the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (C&AG) expect M/s. VR & Associates to conduct in this context is Propriety Audit since C&AG expressed concern that the proposed R&D expenditure of 2,000 crores appeared wasteful and lacking justification on the test of public interest. Propriety audit stands for verification of transactions on the tests of public interest, commonly accepted customs and standards of conduct. Propriety requires transactions, and more particularly expenditure, to conform to certain general principles. The following principles should be applied by M/s. VR & Associates: (i) that the expenditure is not prima facie more than the occasion demands and that every official exercises the same degree of vigilance in respect of expenditure as a person of ordinary prudence would exercise in respect of his own money; (ii) that the authority exercises its power of sanctioning expenditure to pass an order which will not directly or indirectly accrue to its own advantage; (iii) that funds are not utilised for the benefit of a particular person or group of persons and (iv) that, apart from the agreed remuneration or reward, no other avenue is kept open to indirectly benefit the management personnel, employees and others.

Topics: Overview of Audit of Public Sector Undertakings

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic