One of the independent directors sought information regarding the appointment of internal auditors for the following Group Companies in accordance…
CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · MTP · January 2026
One of the independent directors sought information regarding the appointment of internal auditors for the following Group Companies in accordance with the Companies Act, 2013 of which certain financial information is given below: Name Nature Equity Share Capital Turnover Loan from Bank and PFI Public Deposits AKR Limited Unlisted Public 70 120 70 27 TAK Limited Unlisted Private 90 195 98 - PRM Limited Listed 100 197 25 53 You are required to evaluate the requirements regarding the appointment of internal Auditors for the Group Companies. Discuss.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
As per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013, following class of companies (prescribed in Rule 13 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014) shall be required to appoint an internal auditor or a firm of internal auditors, namely:- (I) every listed company; (II) every unlisted public company having- (i) paid up share capital of fifty crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year; or (ii) turnover of two hundred crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year; or (iii) outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions exceeding one hundred crore rupees or more at any point of time during the preceding financial year; or (iv) outstanding deposits of twenty five crore rupees or more at any point of time during the preceding financial year; and (III) every private company having- (i) turnover of two hundred crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year; or (ii) outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions exceeding one hundred crore rupees or more at any point of time during the preceding financial year. In the given case, AKR Limited is unlisted public company. The company is having 70crore as equity share capital which is exceeding the prescribed limit of rupees fifty crore as per section 138. Thus, AKR Limited is required to appoint an internal auditor as per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013. Further, TAK Limited is an unlisted private company and having 90crore as equity share capital,195 crore as turnover and 98crore loan from Bank and PFI. In view of provisions of section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 discussed above, all the limits are below the prescribed limit for a private company. Therefore, TAK Limited is not required to appoint an internal auditor. Furthermore, PRM Limited is a listed company and as per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013, every listed company is required to appoint an internal auditor or a firm of internal auditors. Thus, in view of the above, PRM Limited is required to appoint an internal auditor. In view of above, it can be concluded that AKR Limited and PRM Limited are required to appoint the internal auditor as per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 whereas TAK Limited is not required to do the same.
Topics: Internal Audit
Related Questions in this Topic
- CA Puneet, engagement partner for the audit of a listed company, decided to use the work of the company's internal audit...
- The following are standalone Multiple Choice Questions from Part I of the paper.
- The Arogya Bank Ltd. was having 130 branches all over India by the year ending 31 st March, 2026. 10 branches of the ba...
- LED Ltd., a manufacturing company, has recently implemented a new ERP system for processing all financial transactions. ...
- QR Ltd., a listed company, has appointed CA Suba as its Chief Internal Auditor, and she is continuing in this role for t...