VMC & Co., a firm of Chartered Accountants, has been auditing the financial statements of Reyox Ltd., a listed company, for the past 7 years. CA…

CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · RTP · September 2025
VMC & Co., a firm of Chartered Accountants, has been auditing the financial statements of Reyox Ltd., a listed company, for the past 7 years. CA Rajat, an engagement partner, has led the audit team throughout this period. A recent quality control review raised concerns regarding a familiarity threat, as CA Rajat has developed a close relationship with key management personnel of the client. Which of the following would be the most appropriate course of action for VMC & Co. to mitigate the threat of independence and objectivity in this case as per SQC 1 in this scenario?
(A) Continue with the same engagement partner, as long as documentation evidences independence in mind and appearance.
(B) Appoint a second partner to assist CA Rajat, but allow him to continue as the lead engagement partner.
(C) Rotate the engagement partner and appoint another qualified partner to lead the audit engagement.
(D) Request Reyox Ltd. to change their finance team to reduce familiarity threats from the client's side.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Correct Answer: Option (C)

Rotate the engagement partner and appoint another qualified partner to lead the audit engagement.

Topics: Standard on Auditing (SA), Quality Control

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic