ABC Limited is in the business of manufacturing of iron ore and steel bars since last decade. The company is having its registered office in Mumbai…

CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · PYQS · September 2025
ABC Limited is in the business of manufacturing of iron ore and steel bars since last decade. The company is having its registered office in Mumbai and factory in Bhiwandi. M/s. R and Associates are appointed as the statutory auditors of the company for the financial year 2024-25. While going through the trial balance of the company, they observed that the company has 50 customers and 40 vendors. They requested the company to authorise them to send the external confirmation to few of its customers and vendors. The company immediately provided them an authority letter to send the external confirmation to their customers and vendors. The auditor sent positive confirmation request to top 3 customers and top 3 vendors. After two days of sending positive confirmation request, the management of the company handed over to them the duly signed response received from the respective customers and vendors to whom they had sent the confirmation request. How would M/s. R and Associates proceed to deal with the situation as the auditor of the company?

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Reliability of External Confirmation: SA 505, “External Confirmations”, states that if the auditor determines that a response to a confirmation request is not reliable, the auditor shall evaluate the implications on the assessment of the relevant risks of material misstatement, including the risk of fraud, and on the related nature, timing and extent of other audit procedures. SA 500, "Audit Evidence”, indicates that even when audit evidence is obtained from sources external to the entity, circumstances may exist that affect its reliability. All responses carry some risk of interception, alteration or fraud. Such risk exists regardless of whether a response is obtained in paper form, or by electronic or other medium. Factors that may indicate doubts about the reliability of a response include that it: was received by the auditor indirectly; or appeared not to come from the originally intended confirming party. In the instant case, ABC Limited has 50 customers and 40 vendors in the year 2024-25. M/s R and associates sent positive confirmation letter to top 3 customers and top 3 vendors. However, after 2 days of sending request, management of the company handed over duly signed response received from respective customers and vendors to auditor. Considering the fact that the response was received by the auditor indirectly, it raises questions on the reliability of responses received and indicates a fraud risk factor that requires evaluation. In view of above, if the auditor has doubts regarding the reliability of these responses, it becomes necessary to obtain additional audit evidence to address those concerns. The auditor should also reassess the risk of material misstatement, including the possibility of fraud, and accordingly design further audit procedures.

Topics: Standard on Auditing (SA)

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic