WYZ Ltd., incorporated during the year 2002-03, is a leading unicorn startup and top manufacturer of silicon wafers, with two advanced plants and…

CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · RTP · May 2025
WYZ Ltd., incorporated during the year 2002-03, is a leading unicorn startup and top manufacturer of silicon wafers, with two advanced plants and over 6,000 employees. As a pioneer in its industry to be listed on the stock exchange, WYZ Ltd. underscores its longstanding and influential presence in the financial market. The company consistently complies with SEBI's Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations of 2015, ensuring regulatory adherence and maintaining credibility among investors and stakeholders. Considering the nature, size and extent, the company has appointed M/s KAP & Co. and M/s BMS & Co. as their joint auditors. Both the Firms divided the work in accordance with the SA 299, shared the allocation of task to Those Charged with Governance and started conducting the audit procedures. During the audit engagement, M/s KAP & Co. was assigned to verify the Property Plant & Equipment (PPE) Register. Mr. K, the engagement partner of M/s KAP & Co., carried out the verification process, however, he did not maintain any documentation of the same. Additionally, he did not perform impairment testing on the PPE at the end of the financial year. Mr. B, the engagement partner of M/s BMS & Co., was responsible for verification of procure to pay process (P2P). However, he was informed by management that Mr. E, their Internal Auditor, has already verified P2P Process and carried out relevant audit procedures and thereby he relied on the work of Mr. E. He neither conducted any independent audit procedure to evaluate the work of the internal auditor nor documented his conclusion regarding the evaluation of the adequacy of work of internal auditors. Moreover, looking at the increase in the scale of business, the management of WYZ Ltd. took the decision to implement ERP in its business during the year and gave contract to INFO Ltd. to develop an ERP suitable for its business. The development of ERP was completed on Aug 12 th , 2023. The management started adoption of ERP and replacing its old practices. The adoption took a span of 4 months and was successfully completed on Dec 3 rd , 2023. The previous software did not have an audit trail feature and the audit trail was operational from Dec 3 rd , 2023. However, the auditors of the company have not reported anything on the above matter relating to the audit trail in their main audit report. In addition to the above, the WYZ Ltd., has one Indian wholly owned subsidiary, ABC Private Ltd., who is in the business of acquisition of shares and securities. M/s PQR & Co. are the auditors of ABC Private Ltd. The important financial information of ABC Private Ltd. is as under: Sr. No Particular Amount (₹) 1. Paid-up Capital 67 Lakhs 2. Loans and Borrowings from Financial Institution 72 lakhs 3. Turnover 154 lakhs 4. Reserve and Surplus 18.36 lakhs Based on the above case scenario, answer the following MCQs:
(A) Mr. K is severally responsible for his own actions and the said work was his responsibility.
(B) No, Mr. B & Mr. K are jointly responsible as they both were joint auditors.
(C) Mr. K is responsible as well as Mr. B is responsible, since Mr. B was compulsorily required to verify the work of Mr. K and he has not verified the same.
(D) Neither Mr. K nor Mr. B is liable for the actions of Mr. Κ.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Correct Answer: Option (A)

Mr. K is severally responsible for his own actions and the said work was his responsibility.

Topics: Standard on Auditing (SA), Group Audits, Reporting

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic