Rajni Ltd., a listed company, has appointed M/s Amit & Co. as its statutory auditor. CA Sunil, who recently joined the firm, has been appointed…
CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · MTP · May 2025
Rajni Ltd., a listed company, has appointed M/s Amit & Co. as its statutory auditor. CA Sunil, who recently joined the firm, has been appointed as the engagement partner for the first time. While preparing for the audit, he realises the importance of ensuring the audit team's independence, as required by standard audit practices. However, when reviewing the firm's framework, he is unable to find any documented policies or procedures addressing independence compliance. What steps should CA Sunil take to ensure compliance with independence requirements for the audit engagement? Why is it necessary for an audit firm to have well-documented policies and procedures to maintain independence? Discuss with reference to the relevant Standards on Auditing.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
As per SQC 1, “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information, and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements," the firm should establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable assurance that the firm, its personnel and, where applicable, others subject to independence requirements (including experts contracted by the firm and network firm personnel), maintain independence where required by the Code. Such policies and procedures should enable the firm to: (i) Communicate its independence requirements to its personnel and, where applicable, to others subject to them; and (ii) Identify and evaluate circumstances and relationships that create threats to independence, and to take appropriate action to eliminate those threats or reduce them to an acceptable level by applying safeguards, or, if considered appropriate, to withdraw from the engagement. Further, as per SA 220, “Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements”, the engagement partner shall form a conclusion on compliance with independence requirements that apply to the audit engagement. In doing so, the engagement partner shall: (i) Obtain relevant information from the firm and, where applicable, network firms, to identify and evaluate circumstances and relationships that create threats to independence; (ii) Evaluate information on identified breaches, if any, of the firm's independence policies and procedures to determine whether they create a threat to independence for the audit engagement; and (iii) Take appropriate action to eliminate such threats or reduce them to an acceptable level by applying safeguards, or, if considered appropriate, to withdraw from the audit engagement, where withdrawal is permitted by law or regulation. The engagement partner shall promptly report to the firm any inability to resolve the matter for appropriate action.
Topics: Standard on Auditing (SA)
Related Questions in this Topic
- While assessing the impact of uncorrected misstatements in the audit of Super Builders Private Limited, Mr. Mahavir enco...
- CA Arjun, CA Bharat and CA Chirag have been appointed as joint auditors of BCA Ltd., a company having manufacturing unit...
- CA Puneet, engagement partner for the audit of a listed company, decided to use the work of the company's internal audit...
- Narayan & Co. is the statutory auditor of Joy Ltd., a company engaged in the tours and travel business. During the audit...
- Raja & Co., Chartered Accountants, are the statutory auditors of Rani Ltd., a listed company, for the year ended 31 Marc...