Mr. Arjun was appointed as the engagement partner for conducting the audit of Kurukshetra Tech Ltd. for financial year 2023-24, on behalf of NEMI…

CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · MTP · November 2024
Mr. Arjun was appointed as the engagement partner for conducting the audit of Kurukshetra Tech Ltd. for financial year 2023-24, on behalf of NEMI & Associates. Mr. Krishna was appointed as the engagement quality control reviewer (EQCR) by the firm for the said audit. During financial year 2023-24, Kurukshetra Tech Ltd. implemented an ERP system in phases, leading to the automation of certain business processes. This implementation had a substantial impact on the auditor's overall audit strategy. Mr. Arjun discussed the implementation of such a system with Mr. Krishna and also told him that such matter may be a key audit matter to be reported in the audit report. Mr. Krishna considered the significance of said matter, however, he was of the opinion that ERP implementation did not appear to link with the matters disclosed in the financial statements and so there was no need to disclose such matter as a key audit matter. Whether the contention of Mr. Krishna is appropriate with respect to the matters to be communicated as a key audit matter?

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

As per SA 701, ‘Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor's Report', the auditor shall determine, from the matters communicated with those charged with governance, those matters that required significant auditor attention in performing the audit. In making this determination, the auditor shall take into account the following: (i) Areas of higher assessed risk of material misstatement, or significant risks identified in accordance with SA 315. (ii) Significant auditor judgments relating to areas in the financial statements that involved significant management judgment, including accounting estimates that have been identified as having high estimation uncertainty. (iii) The effect on the audit of significant events or transactions that occurred during the period. The auditor shall determine which of the aforesaid matters considered were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and therefore are the key audit matters. These aforesaid considerations focus on the nature of matters communicated with those charged with governance. Such matters are often linked to matters disclosed in the financial statements and are intended to reflect areas of the audit of the financial statements that may be of particular interest to intended users. The fact that these considerations are required is not intended to imply that matters related to them are always key audit matters; rather, matters related to such specific considerations are key audit matters only if they are determined to be of most significance in the audit. In addition to matters that relate to the specific required considerations, there may be other matters communicated with those charged with governance that required significant auditor attention and that therefore may be determined to be key audit matters. Such matters may include, for example, matters relevant to the audit that was performed that may not be required to be disclosed in the financial statements. For example, the implementation of a new IT system (or significant changes to an existing IT system) during the period may be an area of significant auditor attention, in particular if such a change had a significant effect on the auditor's overall audit strategy or related to a significant risk (e.g., changes to a system affecting revenue recognition). In the given case, there was implementation of ERP system in the company due to which some of its business processes got automated and which had a significant effect on the auditor's overall audit strategy during the period. As per Mr. Arjun, Engagement Partner, above mentioned matter can be considered as a key audit matter and should be reported in the audit report since it requires significant attention that had affected his overall audit strategy. Mr. Krishna, EQCR, considered the significance of said matter, however, he was of the opinion that ERP implementation did not appear to link with the matters disclosed in the financial statements, therefore, no need to disclose such matter as a key audit matter. In view of the above, the contention of Mr. Krishna is not appropriate as matters that do not link with the matters disclosed in the financial statements can also be considered as a key audit matter, if it requires significant attention.

Topics: Standard on Auditing (SA)

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic