As auditor of Growth Limited, you have sent positive confirmation requests to 45 creditors of the company in March 2024. All of the creditors in the…
CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · MTP · November 2024
As auditor of Growth Limited, you have sent positive confirmation requests to 45 creditors of the company in March 2024. All of the creditors in the informal sector are small concerns. You choose to send positive confirmation requests to all the above parties at their business addresses stated on respective bills after discussing the matter with the CFO of the company. The CFO is cooperative and does not raise any hassles in the matter. Responses to confirmation requests are received within a week's time. Your articled clerk informs you that out of above 45 creditors, GST registrations of 38 concerns have been cancelled during financial year 2023-24 itself by collating information from GST portal. He further informs you that there are no fresh registrations pertaining to PANs of these parties. How would you proceed to deal with the situation as auditor of the company?
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
SA 505, “External Confirmations”, states that if the auditor determines that a response to a confirmation request is not reliable, the auditor shall evaluate the implications on the assessment of the relevant risks of material misstatement, including the risk of fraud, and on the related nature, timing and extent of other audit procedures. In the instant case, GST registrations of 38 concerns have been cancelled in the year 2023-24. It indicates that businesses at those addresses were closed. Further, there are no fresh registrations pertaining to the PANs of these parties. However, the auditor sent external confirmation requests in March 2024, which were duly responded. It raises questions on the reliability of responses received. SA 500, “Audit Evidence” indicates that even when audit evidence is obtained from sources external to the entity, circumstances may exist that affect its reliability. All responses carry some risk of interception, alteration or fraud. Such risk exists regardless of whether a response is obtained in paper form or by electronic or other medium. Factors that may indicate doubts about the reliability of a response include: Was received by the auditor indirectly orAppeared not to come from the originally intended confirming party. Keeping in view the circumstances described in the given situation, there is a risk that the response has not come from the originally intended confirming party. Unreliable responses may indicate a fraud risk factor that requires evaluation.
Topics: Standard on Auditing (SA)
Related Questions in this Topic
- While assessing the impact of uncorrected misstatements in the audit of Super Builders Private Limited, Mr. Mahavir enco...
- CA Arjun, CA Bharat and CA Chirag have been appointed as joint auditors of BCA Ltd., a company having manufacturing unit...
- CA Puneet, engagement partner for the audit of a listed company, decided to use the work of the company's internal audit...
- Narayan & Co. is the statutory auditor of Joy Ltd., a company engaged in the tours and travel business. During the audit...
- Raja & Co., Chartered Accountants, are the statutory auditors of Rani Ltd., a listed company, for the year ended 31 Marc...