Mr. Ayush, the proprietor of BCD & Co Chartered Accountants, was appointed to audit the financial statements of Amrita Industries Private…

CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · RTP · May 2024
Mr. Ayush, the proprietor of BCD & Co Chartered Accountants, was appointed to audit the financial statements of Amrita Industries Private Limited for the Financial Year 2022-23. These financial statements were prepared in accordance with the Dutch GAAP and the terms & conditions specified in the contract between Amrita Industries Private Limited and Dutch Industries b.v. (Pvt. Ltd is known as b.v. in Dutch). One of the terms and conditions of the contract was to get the financial statements audited from an independent auditor. The contract also stipulated auditors to take into account misstatements of € 5000 or more while framing their report. Any misstatements identified below this threshold did not require correction or adjustment in terms of stipulation in contract. While planning audit, the audit team had also determined performance materiality at € 10000 and overall materiality at € 200000. The following information extracted from general purpose financial statements of Amrita Industries Pvt. Ltd. prepared in accordance with provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 is given as under: (Figures in ₹ crores) Particulars FY 22-23 FY 21-22 Turnover 300 250 Borrowings from bank 100 75 Paid up capital 25 25 The borrowings from bank consisted of working capital credit facilities only. The company had been enjoying such credit facilities with a sanctioned amount of 75 crore in Financial Year 21-22. The credit facilities were enhanced to 100 crore at beginning of Financial Year 22-23. Outstanding balance in above credit facilities has never crossed sanctioned limits at any time during each of the above years. Mr. Shubham, partner at BB & Associates, Chartered Accountants firm, was appointed as engagement partner for audit of general-purpose financial statements of Amrita Industries Private Limited for FY 2022-23. Before finalising audit plan, BB & Associates asked for internal audit reports. However, management informed him that there was no internal audit team or function in the organization. During the course of audit of general-purpose financial statements, Mr. Anand, an audit executive performed risk assessment procedures, test of controls and substantive procedures. He performed a trend analysis to compare the purchases of raw materials in various months. He also performed purchase-production-sale cycle analysis to understand inventory holding. Besides going through the company's internal control manuals and visiting company's plant, inquiries were also made with company's information system personnel to provide information about control failures. Diligent inquiries were also made from company's marketing personnel regarding contractual arrangements with customers. Inquiries were also made from company's in-house legal counsel and communications were also made with company's external legal counsel by sending a letter of inquiry. While issuing the report, BCD & Co inserted an Other Matter Paragraph in the Audit Report specifying the use of a special purpose financial reporting framework for preparing and presenting the financial statements. On the other hand, BB & Associates decided to issue an adverse opinion on all financial statement except for cash flow statement and an unmodified opinion on cash flow statement. As per BB & Associates, the cash flow statement was prepared as per the required method, and hence, it did reflect the appropriate figures.
(A) In the case of special purpose financial statements, management may agree with the intended users on a threshold below which misstatements identified during the audit will not be corrected or otherwise adjusted. The existence of such a threshold does not relieve the auditor from the requirement to determine materiality in accordance with SA 320 for purposes of planning and performing the audit of the special purpose financial statements.
(B) In the case of special purpose financial statements, management may agree with the intended users on a threshold below which misstatements identified during the audit will not be corrected or otherwise adjusted. The existence of such a threshold is sufficient to comply with the requirement of determining materiality in accordance with SA 320 for purposes of planning and performing the audit of the special purpose financial statements.
(C) In the case of special purpose financial statements, misstatements based on consideration of the financial information needs of the intended users are considered material and pervasive. However, the auditor needs to follow the threshold limit provided in terms of the contract, and such thresholds should be considered as the performance materiality for planning and performing the audit.
(D) The auditor is required to comply with each requirement of an SA unless, in the circumstances of the audit, the entire SA is not relevant, or the requirement is not relevant because it is conditional and the condition does not exist. In the case of an audit of special purpose financial statements, the requirements of SA 320 are not applicable in entirety.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Correct Answer: Option (A)

In the case of special purpose financial statements, management may agree with the intended users on a threshold below which misstatements identified during the audit will not be corrected or otherwise adjusted. The existence of such a threshold does not relieve the auditor from the requirement to determine materiality in accordance with SA 320 for purposes of planning and performing the audit of the special purpose financial statements.

Topics: Standard on Auditing (SA), Group Audits, Reporting

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic