BPMR and Associates, a renowned audit firm in the field of CA practice for the past three decades, was appointed to conduct the statutory audit of…
CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · MTP · May 2024
BPMR and Associates, a renowned audit firm in the field of CA practice for the past three decades, was appointed to conduct the statutory audit of Rexlon Ltd., an unlisted company engaged in the business of paper manufacturing. The firm decided to commence the audit for the recently concluded financial year. After making significant progress in the audit, the auditors made the following observations: Observation 1: The management had disclosed in the financials that, during the year, one of the warehouses of the Company was affected due to a major flood. As a result of the same, the Company had incurred some losses. But the management was of the view that it was not material. Observation 2: Due to the flood, few records maintained by the Company with respect to a particular transaction was completely destroyed and there was no duplicate record maintained by the Company. However, those details were not pervasive, but material. You are required to advise whether BPMR and Associates should report Observation 1 and 2 in its audit report? If so, under which heading should it be reported?
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Observation 1 - The management had disclosed in the financials that, during the year, one of the warehouses of the Company was affected due to a major flood. As a result of the same, the Company had incurred some losses. But the management was of the view that it was not material. As per SA 706, “Emphasis of Matter Paragraph & Other Matter Paragraph in the Independent Auditor's Report”, an Emphasis of Matter Paragraph refers to matter appropriately disclosed in the financials, that in the auditor's judgement is of such importance that it is fundamental to users' understanding of the financials. Hence, in this case, the auditor shall report about the consequences of the flood which affected the company's warehouse under Emphasis of Matter Paragraph. Observation 2 - Due to flood, few records pertaining to particular transactions were completely destroyed and in the absence of duplicate records, the auditor was unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence and those details were material but not pervasive. Therefore, in accordance with SA 705, the auditor is required to issue Qualified opinion.
Topics: Standard on Auditing (SA)
Related Questions in this Topic
- While assessing the impact of uncorrected misstatements in the audit of Super Builders Private Limited, Mr. Mahavir enco...
- CA Arjun, CA Bharat and CA Chirag have been appointed as joint auditors of BCA Ltd., a company having manufacturing unit...
- CA Puneet, engagement partner for the audit of a listed company, decided to use the work of the company's internal audit...
- Narayan & Co. is the statutory auditor of Joy Ltd., a company engaged in the tours and travel business. During the audit...
- Raja & Co., Chartered Accountants, are the statutory auditors of Rani Ltd., a listed company, for the year ended 31 Marc...