While conducting audit of CGX Limited, a listed company, for year 2022-23, CA. Srishti notices that company has extinguished following material…
CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · MTP · May 2024
While conducting audit of CGX Limited, a listed company, for year 2022-23, CA. Srishti notices that company has extinguished following material liabilities unilaterally without entering into settlement with creditors and reported these amounts as gains under “Other income”. The details in this respect are as under: S. No. Particulars Amount involved (i) Liabilities for purchases of raw material were written back on account of poor quality of raw material and difference in rates 3.50 crores (ii) Liabilities for capital goods were written back on account of defects in machinery supplied by creditors 2.00 crores The management is of the opinion that these dues are no longer payable. Therefore, retaining these liabilities on financial statements would lead to overstatement of liabilities. Extinguishment of liabilities was made by company in accordance with normal trade practices and outstandings were written back after stopping dealing with such creditors. She wanted to send external confirmation requests to such creditors. However, management informed her that sending such requests may be used by creditors as proof of existence of liability. She is contemplating inclusion of above matters under “Key audit matters" in audit report. Analyse the situation threadbare.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
(a) A liability is a present obligation of the entity to transfer an economic resource as a result of past events. Instead of fulfilling an obligation to transfer an economic resource to the party that has a right to receive that resource, entities sometimes decide to, for example: (a) settle the obligation by negotiating a release from the obligation; (b) transfer the obligation to a third party; or (c) replace that obligation to transfer an economic resource with another obligation by entering into a new transaction. In the above situations, an entity has the obligation to transfer an economic resource until it has settled, transferred or replaced that obligation. In the given situation, the company has written back liabilities due to creditors unilaterally. The company has not settled the obligation by negotiating a release from the obligation from respective creditors. Such an accounting treatment by management is questionable and against the conceptual framework for financial reporting under Ind AS. CA. Srishti wanted to send external confirmations in accordance with SA 505,” External Confirmations” but management informed her that sending such requests may be used by creditors as proof of existence of liability. In fact, she should display professional skepticism and be alert to the possibility of misstatements in financial statements, if restrained by management from obtaining external confirmations. The reasons advanced by management do not appear to be valid and reasonable. In accordance with SA 505, she should reassess risks and perform alternative audit procedures to mitigate such risks. Besides, she should consider implications of same for her audit opinion. Further, SA 705," Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor's Report" requires that the auditor shall modify the opinion in the auditor's report when: (a) The auditor concludes that, based on the audit evidence obtained, the financial statements as a whole are not free from material misstatement; or (b) The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude that the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement. SA 705 also states that misstatements in financial statements arise when selected accounting policies are not in accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework. It also states that examples of an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence arise from a limitation on the scope of audit imposed by management when management prevents the auditor from requesting external confirmation of specific account balances. Therefore, she needs to issue a modified opinion. Keeping in view above, her contemplation of including above matters under "Key audit matters” is not proper and is not in accordance with SA 701," Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor's Report". It states that the auditor shall not communicate a matter in the Key Audit Matters section of the auditor's report when the auditor would be required to modify the opinion in accordance with SA 705 as a result of the matter. Communicating key audit matters in the auditor's report is not a substitute for the auditor expressing a modified opinion when required by the circumstances of a specific audit engagement in accordance with SA 705.
Topics: Standard on Auditing (SA)
Related Questions in this Topic
- While assessing the impact of uncorrected misstatements in the audit of Super Builders Private Limited, Mr. Mahavir enco...
- CA Arjun, CA Bharat and CA Chirag have been appointed as joint auditors of BCA Ltd., a company having manufacturing unit...
- CA Puneet, engagement partner for the audit of a listed company, decided to use the work of the company's internal audit...
- Narayan & Co. is the statutory auditor of Joy Ltd., a company engaged in the tours and travel business. During the audit...
- Raja & Co., Chartered Accountants, are the statutory auditors of Rani Ltd., a listed company, for the year ended 31 Marc...