Under new legislation, an entity is required to fit smoke filters to its factories by 30th September, 20X1. The entity has not fitted the smoke…

CA Final · Financial Reporting · MTP · November 2024
Under new legislation, an entity is required to fit smoke filters to its factories by 30th September, 20X1. The entity has not fitted the smoke filters. It is assumed that a reliable estimate can be made of any outflows expected. Determine whether any provision is required to be made by the entity on (a) At 31st March, 20X1, the end of the reporting period (b) At 31st March, 20X2, the end of the reporting period (4 Marks)

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

(a) At 31st March, 20X1, the end of the reporting period Present obligation as a result of a past obligating event – There is no obligation because there is no obligating event either for the costs of fitting smoke filters or for fines under the legislation. Conclusion – No provision is recognised for the cost of fitting the smoke filters. (b) At 31st March, 20X2, the end of the reporting period Present obligation as a result of a past obligating event – There is still no obligation for the costs of fitting smoke filters because no obligating event has occurred (the fitting of the filters). However, an obligation might arise to pay fines or penalties under the legislation because the obligating event has occurred (the non-compliant operation of the factory). An outflow of resources embodying economic benefits in settlement – Assessment of probability of incurring fines and penalties by non-compliant operation depends on the details of the legislation and the stringency of the enforcement regime. Conclusion – No provision is recognised for the costs of fitting smoke filters. However, a provision is recognised for the best estimate of any fines and penalties that are more likely than not to be imposed.

Topics: Ind AS 37

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic