Orion Aerospace Ltd. manufactures highly customized components for satellites launched by the France and Germany. The company operates through eight…
CA Intermediate · Financial Management and Strategic Management · MTP · January 2026
Orion Aerospace Ltd. manufactures highly customized components for satellites launched by the France and Germany. The company operates through eight locations worldwide, including its central headquarters. To streamline the budgeting process and reduce escalating travel costs, the Finance Director, Ms. Ananya Rao, is considering the introduction of video conferencing as an alternative to physical meetings. In previous years, the company sent two executives from each location to the central headquarters twice a year for budget discussions. The average travel cost per executive (including airfare, accommodation, and meals) is 27,000 per trip. Under the proposed plan, Orion Aerospace Ltd. would install a video conferencing system at each location at a cost of 8,25,000 per location. In addition, the system would incur an average telephone transmission cost of 300 per hour, and it is estimated that 48 hours of transmission time per year would be required to complete the budgeting process. The company depreciates such equipment using the straight-line method over a useful life of five years, with no residual value. As an alternative, the company may opt to use locally rented video conferencing facilities, which are available at a cost of 1,500 per hour, plus 400 per hour towards average telephone charges. Additional Information: The company follows a policy of minimum annual cash savings of 10% of the existing travel cost before approving any new cost-saving technology. You are a Senior Officer in the Finance Department. Based on the above information, you are required to EVALUATE the proposal and advise Ms. Ananya Rao on whether Orion Aerospace Ltd. should implement video conferencing, and if so, WHICH alternative would be financially preferable.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Option 1: Cost of travel, in case Video Conferencing facility is not provided Total Trip = No. of Locations × No. of Persons × No. of Trips per Person = 7 × 2 × 2 = 28 Trips Total Travel Cost (including air fare, hotel accommodation and meals) (28 trips × ₹ 27,000 per trip) = 7,56,000 Option II: Video Conferencing Facility is provided by Installation of Own Equipment at Different Locations Cost of Equipment at each location (₹ 8,25,000 × 8 locations) = 66,00,000 Economic life of Machines (5 years). Annual depreciation (66,00,000/5) = 13,20,000 Annual transmission cost (48 hrs. transmission × 8 locations × 300per hour) = 1,15,200 Annual cost of operation (13,20,000 + 1,15,200) = 14,35,200 Option III: Engaging Video Conferencing Facility on Rental Basis Rental cost (48 hrs. × 8 location × ₹ 1,500 per hr) = 5,76,000 Telephone cost (48 hrs.× 8 locations × 400per hr.) = 1,53,600 Total rental cost of equipment (5,76,000 + 1,53,600) = 7,29,600 Minimum required savings = 10% of existing travel cost Required minimum savings = 10% of 7,56,000 = 75,600 Actual Savings Using Rented Facilities = 7,56,000 -7,29,600 = 26,400 Analysis: The annual cost is minimum, if video conferencing facility is engaged on rental basis. However, saving is less than 10% of existing travel cost. Therefore, no change is suggested.
Topics: Part-A: Financial Management, Part B: Strategic Management
Related Questions in this Topic
- Distinguish between Strategic Planning and Operational Planning.
- Cura-Stents India Ltd., a manufacturer of high-precision cardiac stents, follows stringent international quality and ste...
- EcoBuild Materials Ltd. manufactures specialised construction materials. One of its business divisions has been evaluate...
- Elite Motors Ltd., a luxury automobile manufacturer, exclusively targets ultra-high-net-worth individuals by offering pr...
- Write a short note on the key strategic drivers of an organization.