You are appointed as statutory auditor of Zebra Industries Ltd. for FY 2024-25. During the course of audit, you observe that the company's…
CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · RTP · May 2026
You are appointed as statutory auditor of Zebra Industries Ltd. for FY 2024-25. During the course of audit, you observe that the company's management frequently delays in providing certain documents and explanations requested by you. A portion of the accounting records related to "special procurement” is supported only by basic acknowledgements without proper vendor details. You also notice that some transactions appear to be with entities that may be related to the company, but management denies the existence of any such relationships. Further, during verification, you find that some documents produced as evidence appear unusually uniform and lack standard commercial markings, raising concerns about their authenticity. Since your audit is conducted on a test-check basis, you are unable to verify all such transactions individually. Based on the above, explain the inherent limitations of an audit that restrict the auditor from obtaining absolute assurance that the financial statements of Zebra Industries Ltd. are free from material misstatement.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
The auditor carries out his work by obtaining audit evidence through performance of audit procedures. However, there are practical and legal limitations on ability of auditor to obtain audit evidence. For example, an auditor does not test all transactions and balances. He forms his opinion only by testing samples. It is an example of practical limitation on auditor's ability to obtain audit evidence. Management may not provide complete information as requested by auditor. There is no way by which auditor can force management to provide complete information as may be requested by auditor. In case he is not provided with required information, he can only report. It is an example of legal limitation on auditor's ability to obtain audit evidence. The management may consist of dishonest and unscrupulous people and may be, itself, involved in fraud. It may be engaged in concealing fraud by designing sophisticated and carefully organised schemes which may be hard to detect by the auditor. It may produce fabricated documents before auditor to lead him to believe that audit evidence is valid. However, in reality, such documents could be fake or non-genuine. Auditor is not an expert in authentication of documents. Therefore, he may be led to accept invalid audit evidence on the basis of unauthentic documents. It is quite possible that entity may have entered into some transactions with related parties. Such transactions may be only paper transactions and may not have actually occurred. The auditor may not be aware of such related party relationships or audit procedures may not be able to detect probable wrong doings in such transactions. These factors collectively demonstrate that, due to practical constraints, legal boundaries, management fraud risks, and limitations in detecting related party transactions, the auditor can obtain only reasonable assurance and not absolute assurance regarding the accuracy of the financial statements.
Topics: Nature, Objective and Scope of Audit
Related Questions in this Topic
- ABC Ltd., a listed company, has engaged CST & Co., Chartered Accountants, as statutory auditors to audit its financial s...
- A practitioner is engaged to perform two different types of assurance engagements—one requiring a high level of assuranc...
- RS & Associates, Chartered Accountants, were appointed as the statutory auditors of Zene Biotech Limited, a company enga...
- Apex Infra Ltd. is a mid-sized infrastructure company engaged in construction of highways and bridges. During the statut...
- OPQ Ltd. is a widely held company engaged in manufacturing activities. The management of the company is responsible for ...