During audit of Kavita Ltd., the auditor performs various audit procedures such as inspection, observation, confirmation, recalculation,…
CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · MTP · January 2026
During audit of Kavita Ltd., the auditor performs various audit procedures such as inspection, observation, confirmation, recalculation, reperformance, and analytical procedures. Some information obtained supports management's assertions, while other information appears to contradict them. The auditor also considers data obtained from the entity's accounting records and from the previous year's audit. Explain how the auditor obtains sufficient appropriate audit evidence to form an opinion on the financial statements.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
As per SA 500 on “Audit Evidence”, the auditor shall design and perform audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of obtaining sufficient and appropriate audit evidence. Audit evidence is necessary to support the auditor's opinion and report. It is cumulative in nature and is primarily obtained from audit procedures performed during the course of the audit. It may, however, also include information obtained from other sources such as previous audits. In addition to other sources inside and outside the entity, the entity's accounting records are an important source of audit evidence. Also, information that may be used as audit evidence may have been prepared using the work of a management's expert. Audit evidence comprises both information that supports and corroborates management's assertions, and any information that contradicts such assertions. In addition, in some cases the absence of information (for example, management's refusal to provide a requested representation) is used by the auditor, and therefore, also constitutes audit evidence. Most of the auditor's work in forming the auditor's opinion consists of obtaining and evaluating audit evidence. The auditor uses various audit procedures to obtain audit evidence such as inspection, observation, confirmation, recalculation, reperformance and analytical procedures, often in some combination, in addition to inquiry. Reasonable assurance is obtained when the auditor has obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence to reduce audit risk (i.e., the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated) to an acceptably low level. SA 330 requires the auditor to conclude whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level, and thereby enable the auditor to draw reasonable conclusions on which to base the auditor's opinion, is a matter of professional judgment. SA 200 contains discussion of such matters as the nature of audit procedures, the timeliness of financial reporting, and the balance between benefit and cost, which are relevant factors when the auditor exercises professional judgment regarding whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained.
Topics: Audit Evidence
Related Questions in this Topic
- VW & Co., Chartered Accountants, are auditing GHI Ltd., a company engaged in infrastructure development. The company has...
- TUV & Co., Chartered Accountants, are appointed as statutory auditors of DEF Ltd. for the year ending on 31st March, 202...
- While evaluating the reliability of audit evidence, the audit team identifies the following documents: Delivery challa...
- An auditor wants to ensure that he has complete knowledge of all locations where a company's inventories are stored. Sin...
- CA Arjun, the statutory auditor of XYZ Ltd., was engaged to conduct the audit of the financial statements for the financ...