During the audit of SITU Bank Ltd, the auditor reviews the loan portfolio and comes across the account of M/s Neem Tree Infrastructure Ltd., which…

CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · MTP · January 2026
During the audit of SITU Bank Ltd, the auditor reviews the loan portfolio and comes across the account of M/s Neem Tree Infrastructure Ltd., which has an outstanding balance of 10 crore. The latest valuation report by an RBI approved valuer indicates that the realisable value of the security available against this loan is only 80 lakh. The value of the same security during the previous RBI inspection was 6 crore. Additionally, in another borrower account, M/s Gayatri Textiles Pvt. Ltd., with an outstanding balance of 5 crore, the realisable value of security is estimated to be 40 lakh. As an auditor, how should these two accounts be classified as per RBI's prudential norms on income recognition and asset classification? What would be the appropriate provisioning treatment in each case?

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Erosion means the gradual destruction or diminution of something not prudent to follow stages of asset classification. It should be straight-away classified as doubtful or loss asset as appropriate as follows: (i) Erosion in the value of security can be reckoned as significant when the realisable value of the security is less than 50% of the value assessed by the bank or accepted by RBI at the time of last inspection, as the case may be. Such NPAs may be straight-away classified under doubtful category and provisioning should be made as applicable to doubtful assets. (ii) If the realisable value of the security, as assessed by the bank/ approved valuers/ RBI is less than 10% of the outstanding in the borrower accounts, the existence of security should be ignored and the asset should be straight-away classified as loss asset. It may be either written off or fully provided for by the bank. Based on above, the two accounts can be classified as per RBI norms as under : M/s Neem Tree Infrastructure Ltd. The realizable value of the security (₹ 0.8 crore) is less than 50% of the value assessed at the time of last inspection (6crore).This represents significant erosion in the value of security.Hence, the account should be straight-away classified as a Doubtful Asset, and provisioning should be made as applicable to doubtful assets. M/s Gayatri Textiles Pvt. Ltd. The realizable value of security (₹ 0.4 crore) is less than 10% of the outstanding balance (5crore).This means the security is practically non-existent.Therefore, the account should be classified as a Loss Asset, which may be written off or fully provided for by the bank.

Topics: Audit of Banks

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic