CA Pari is conducting the audit of Heavy Ltd., a company with large number of customers which are generally small retail shop owners. While…

CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · PYQS · May 2025
CA Pari is conducting the audit of Heavy Ltd., a company with large number of customers which are generally small retail shop owners. While verifying sundry debtors, CA Pari assesses the risk of material misstatement (ROMM) as low and internal control is operating effectively. With reference to SA 505 (External Confirmations): (i) Which type of confirmation request is most likely to be used by CA Pari in this scenario? (1 Mark) (ii) What are the conditions necessary for using such a confirmation request effectively? (4 Marks)

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

(i) CA Pari is most likely to use Negative Confirmation Request since she has assessed the risk of material misstatement as low and internal control is operating effectively. (ii) The auditor shall not use negative confirmation requests as the sole substantive audit procedure to address an assessed risk of material misstatement at the assertion level unless all of the following are present: The auditor has assessed the risk of material misstatement as low and has obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the operating effectiveness of controls relevant to the assertion;The population of items subject to negative confirmation procedures comprises a large number of small, homogeneous, account balances, transactions or conditions;A very low exception rate is expected; andThe auditor is not aware of circumstances or conditions that would cause recipients of negative confirmation requests to disregard such requests.

Topics: Audit Evidence

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic