Jin Kushal & Associates is a firm of Chartered Accountants practicing in Delhi. The firm consists of two partners namely, CA Jin and CA Kushal.…
CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · MTP · May 2025
Jin Kushal & Associates is a firm of Chartered Accountants practicing in Delhi. The firm consists of two partners namely, CA Jin and CA Kushal. The Statutory audit team is generally headed by CA Jin and his team consists of three articled assistants and one qualified Chartered Accountant, CA Reshu. With respect to the audit work of 4 clients for which the audit team intends to start the audit work, CA Jin discussed with the team members about the development of audit programmes for individual clients. One of the articled assistants, Mr. Sumit, was of the view that one single audit programme can be developed for all the 4 clients operating in different industries. With respect to one of the clients namely, Saraswati Ltd., a labour-intensive company, CA Jin asked CA Reshu to compare the amount of wages paid by the company in the current year and last year. Also, she was asked to verify the relationship between the number of employees and wages paid in both the years by the company. The audit firm started the audit of another client, namely, Sarthak Ltd. having maximum transactions in foreign currency. CA Jin asked one of the team members, Mr. Rahul, to verify whether the calculations related to conversion of the foreign currency into local currency is proper or not. While verifying the share issue transactions of one client, namely, Laxman Ltd., CA Reshu found that the company has issued sweat equity shares during the year under audit. She asked one of the articled assistants, Mr. Saurabh, to further verify whether the relevant provisions of the Companies Act 2013, have been complied by the company in this regard. Also, with respect to Sarthak Ltd., there was reduction of share capital during the year. Mr. Saurabh was asked by the engagement partner to verify the compliance of relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 in this regard also. Mr. Saurabh was of the view that there is requirement of passing of Special Resolution by the respective company for both. While starting the audit work of another client, Rintex Ltd., the audit team noticed that the company has its internal audit team. Mr. Sumit was of the view that the statutory audit team can use and rely on the work of the Internal Auditors of the company and as such there is no requirement for the statutory audit team to perform audit procedures again as the internal audit team must have verified the financial transactions of the company in detail. Further, while verifying the expenses ledger, Mr. Sumit noticed that the company has implemented a system whereby the entries related to expenses incurred during the year can be entered into the accounting system by authorised personnels only. However, with respect to travelling expenses which constituted about 30% of the total expenses, the entries were made by employees who were not authorised to make such entries. Based on the above facts, answer the following: -
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Correct Answer: Option (B)
No, the view of Mr. Sumit is not correct as all the four clients operate in different industries and evolving one audit programme for all businesses is not practicable.
Topics: Audit Evidence, Risk Assessment and Internal Control
Related Questions in this Topic
- VW & Co., Chartered Accountants, are auditing GHI Ltd., a company engaged in infrastructure development. The company has...
- TUV & Co., Chartered Accountants, are appointed as statutory auditors of DEF Ltd. for the year ending on 31st March, 202...
- While evaluating the reliability of audit evidence, the audit team identifies the following documents: Delivery challa...
- An auditor wants to ensure that he has complete knowledge of all locations where a company's inventories are stored. Sin...
- CA Arjun, the statutory auditor of XYZ Ltd., was engaged to conduct the audit of the financial statements for the financ...