CA Sudhakar has been appointed as the auditor of AMRO Ltd. Before accepting the appointment, he learns that his cousin, who held shares in the…
CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · RTP · January 2025
CA Sudhakar has been appointed as the auditor of AMRO Ltd. Before accepting the appointment, he learns that his cousin, who held shares in the company and recently passed away without children, named him as the nominee for these shares, which have substantial value. Although holding such shares through a distant relative does not violate legal provisions or affect his independence, this unexpected inheritance places him in a dilemma. Advise CA Sudhakar on how he should deal with this situation and safeguard his independence.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
In the given situation, holding shares by CA Sudhakar involves financial interest in the company and is in nature of self-interest threat. Though he has come to hold shares due to nomination made by his distant relative before accepting the appointment. Chartered Accountants have a responsibility to remain independent by taking into account the context in which they practice, the threats to independence and the safeguards available to address the threats. Safeguards are actions, individually or in combination, that the professional accountant takes that effectively reduce threats to comply with the fundamental principles to an acceptable level. To address the issue, the following guiding principles are to be applied: - For the public to have confidence in the quality of audit, it is essential that auditors should always be and appear to be independent of the entities that they are auditing.Before taking on any work, an auditor must conscientiously consider whether it involves threats to his independence.When such threats exist, the auditor should either desist from the task or eliminate the threat or at the very least, put in place safeguards which reduce the threats to an acceptable level. All such safeguard measures need to be recorded in a form that can serve as evidence of compliance with due process.If the auditor is unable to fully implement credible and adequate safeguards, then he must not accept the work. Considering above, holding of shares of the same company for which he is offered appointment as auditor constitutes threat to his independence. Therefore, CA Sudhakar should take steps to eliminate the threat by selling shares immediately before accepting the appointment and in the absence of same, he should not accept the appointment as an auditor.
Topics: Ethics and Terms of Audit Engagements
Related Questions in this Topic
- During the statutory audit of Cee Manufacturing Ltd. for the financial year ended 31st March 2026, CA Karan, the engagem...
- You are the auditor of a bank. During the audit, you are required to verify the provisions and contingencies recognised ...
- Sunrise Foundation, a registered charitable trust engaged in providing free healthcare services in rural areas, appointe...
- CA Neha Arora was appointed as the statutory auditor of Stellar Healthcare Limited for the financial year 2025-26. Durin...
- Explain the responsibilities of the engagement partner under SA 220, Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statement...