PQR & Co., Chartered Accountants, has been appointed as statutory auditor of MGM Ltd. The financial statements of the company have material…
CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · PYQS · January 2025
PQR & Co., Chartered Accountants, has been appointed as statutory auditor of MGM Ltd. The financial statements of the company have material amount outstanding as debtors. Ageing of debtors is being done by the internal auditors and is given by them in their monthly report. This issue was also discussed with the management. The engagement partner from PQR & Co. decided to give the age wise debtors as per the report of internal auditor due to shortage of time. After the audit report was released, the engagement partner realized that the disclosure of the debtors is misleading and the ageing was not done by the internal auditor on correct principles due to which the provision made against old debtors was wrong. The engagement partner held the internal auditor responsible for this. Is he correct in making statement that the internal auditor is responsible for false provisioning? What considerations PQR & Co. should have undertaken before relying on the work of internal auditor? (5 Marks)
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
In the given situation, the engagement partner has taken the age wise debtor report from the reports of the internal auditor due to shortage of time and provided the same in the audit report. However, after the issuance of audit report, engagement partner felt that disclosure of debtors is misleading and ageing is not done on the basis of correct principles due to which wrong provisions are made. Contention of the engagement partner for holding internal auditor responsible for the same is not correct as the external auditor has sole responsibility for the audit opinion expressed, and that responsibility is not reduced by the external auditor's use of the work of the internal audit function or internal auditors to provide direct assistance on the engagement. Before relying on the work of internal auditor, PQR & Co. should consider the following: (i) To determine whether the work of the internal audit function or direct assistance from internal auditors can be used, and if so, in which areas and to what extent; and having made that determination; (ii) If using the work of the internal audit function, to determine whether that work is adequate for purposes of the audit; and (iii) If using internal auditors to provide direct assistance, to appropriately direct, supervise and review their work; (iv) The extent to which the internal audit function's organizational status and relevant policies and procedures support the objectivity of the internal auditors; (v) The level of competence of the internal audit function; and (vi) Whether the internal audit function applies a systematic and disciplined approach, including quality control.
Topics: Audit Evidence
Related Questions in this Topic
- VW & Co., Chartered Accountants, are auditing GHI Ltd., a company engaged in infrastructure development. The company has...
- TUV & Co., Chartered Accountants, are appointed as statutory auditors of DEF Ltd. for the year ending on 31st March, 202...
- While evaluating the reliability of audit evidence, the audit team identifies the following documents: Delivery challa...
- An auditor wants to ensure that he has complete knowledge of all locations where a company's inventories are stored. Sin...
- CA Arjun, the statutory auditor of XYZ Ltd., was engaged to conduct the audit of the financial statements for the financ...