Oval Services Ltd. appointed Rupa & Associates as the auditors for the financial year 2023-2024. The auditors believe that an audit program is…

CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · MTP · January 2025
Oval Services Ltd. appointed Rupa & Associates as the auditors for the financial year 2023-2024. The auditors believe that an audit program is crucial in providing clear and comprehensive instructions for the tasks to be carried out, offering a total perspective of the work involved. This is particularly important for large audits, and as such, they prepared an initial audit program based on the company's organisational structure and effective internal controls. During the audit, CA Nitin, Engagement Partner identified issues with the company's debt management practices, prompting the inclusion of a more detailed review of the loan agreements. However, in his opinion the planned review of petty cash was unnecessary due to the company's policy of limiting cash transactions. Thus, review procedure was removed from the audit programme. To verify the balances of trade payables, the auditor decided to send external confirmation requests to the creditors of the company. These requests were made to verify the balances as on 20th March 2024, a date chosen deliberately to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the liabilities, free from any influence or prior knowledge of management. This approach was taken to maintain the integrity of the confirmation process. However, it was noted that M/s. Keshav Traders and M/s. Amrit Distributors did not respond to the confirmation requests. Furthermore, the auditor noted that in the financial year 2023-2024, the company's Property, Plant, and Equipment (PPE) was revalued, resulting in an increase of 5% in the net carrying value of its machinery from 10 lakh to 10.5 lakh. Also, due to the significant compliance burden, company is considering to convert into a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP). Management views the LLP structure as a hybrid business model that combines the advantages of both companies and partnerships. Additionally, they believe this conversion would relieve them of mandatory audit requirements.
(A) No. Because an audit programme should always include a petty cash review, regardless of company policy.
(B) Yes. Because the company's internal controls and policy of limiting cash transactions reduce the need for a petty cash review in the audit programme.
(C) No. Because the audit programme must cover all the areas of financial transactions, including petty cash, to ensure comprehensive auditing.
(D) Yes. Because the audit programme should only focus on areas with high financial risk, and petty cash is not a high-risk area.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Correct Answer: Option (B)

Yes. Because the company's internal controls and policy of limiting cash transactions reduce the need for a petty cash review in the audit programme.

Topics: Audit Evidence, Audit Report

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic