During the audit of accounts for the year ended 31.03.2024, the auditor of FD Limited wanted confirmation from a Trade Receivable, which was…
CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · PYQS · September 2024
During the audit of accounts for the year ended 31.03.2024, the auditor of FD Limited wanted confirmation from a Trade Receivable, which was outstanding for more than six months, amounting to 4,25,000/-. The auditor sent a Confirmation letter to the party requesting them to respond directly to him, whether or not they agree with the amount outstanding from them. That trade receivable confirmed to the auditor of FD Limited, that they were required to pay an amount of 4,20,000 to FD Limited as per their books of accounts. State and explain the type of Confirmation Request sent by the auditor and the course of action that he should take on the confirmation received from the trade receivable.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Positive confirmation request: A request that the confirming party respond directly to the auditor indicating whether the confirming party agrees or disagrees with the information in the request or providing the requested information. Exception - A response that indicates a difference between information requested to be confirmed, or contained in the entity's records, and information provided by the confirming party. The exception needs to be assessed to the entire population after analyzing the reason for difference. In the given situation, the auditor has sent the positive confirmation request for the amount of 4,25,000 to a trade receivable which was outstanding for more than 6 months, however, due to difference between information requested to be confirmed, or contained in the entity's records (i.e. 4,25,000), and information provided by the confirming party (i.e. 4,20,000) is forming situation of exception confirmation. The auditor's evaluation, when taken into account with other audit procedures the auditor may have performed, may assist the auditor in concluding whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained or whether performing further audit procedures is necessary, as required by SA 330 in case a response is indicating an exception. The company should be asked to investigate and reconcile the discrepancy indicated by the confirming party.
Topics: Audit Evidence
Related Questions in this Topic
- VW & Co., Chartered Accountants, are auditing GHI Ltd., a company engaged in infrastructure development. The company has...
- TUV & Co., Chartered Accountants, are appointed as statutory auditors of DEF Ltd. for the year ending on 31st March, 202...
- While evaluating the reliability of audit evidence, the audit team identifies the following documents: Delivery challa...
- An auditor wants to ensure that he has complete knowledge of all locations where a company's inventories are stored. Sin...
- CA Arjun, the statutory auditor of XYZ Ltd., was engaged to conduct the audit of the financial statements for the financ...