CA M, auditor of a company, has planned to use substantive analytical procedures during course of audit. In this regard, he has decided to use such…

CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · MTP · September 2024
CA M, auditor of a company, has planned to use substantive analytical procedures during course of audit. In this regard, he has decided to use such procedures in following areas: - (i) For testing relationship between sales and cost of sales (ii) For testing rights over certain assets forming part of account balances Comment upon his approach along with reasons.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

(i) Substantive analytical procedures are more appropriate when an account balance or relationships between items of data are predictable. A predictable relationship is one that may reasonably be expected to exist and continue over time. In the given case CA M, auditor of a company, has planned to use substantive analytical procedures for testing relationship between sales and cost of sales. Hence, auditor's approach is appropriate in this case. (ii) Using substantive analytical procedures is also affected by nature of assertion. Substantive analytical procedures may be more effective in providing evidence for some assertions (e.g., completeness or valuation) than for others (e.g., rights and obligations). In the given case, CA M has planned to use substantive analytical procedures for testing rights over certain assets forming part of account balances. Such procedures are likely to be less effective in this case.

Topics: Audit Evidence

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic