Sanjeev, an articled clerk in an audit firm, is part of an engagement team conducting audit of a company for year 2023-24. It is a small company…
CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · MTP · May 2024
Sanjeev, an articled clerk in an audit firm, is part of an engagement team conducting audit of a company for year 2023-24. It is a small company having a turnover of about 25 crores. During the course of audit, he notices that senior team member has taken following approach for selecting items for testing reflected in financial statements to obtain audit evidence: He has selected to test items debited under the head “Machinery repair & maintenance” as expenditure relating to it during year 23-24 has increased considerably as compared to last year.Out of purchases, he has selected to test purchases from related parties amounting to 5 crores.He has also selected to test all individual items of expenditure exceeding 5 lakhs.Besides, he has also selected amount of 0.50 lakhs debited under head "legal expenses” to know purpose of payment made to external legal counsel. Sanjeev understands that senior team member is using "audit sampling" for selecting items for testing. Do you agree with him? Which risk is involved in above approach? Discuss with reasons.
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
Audit Sampling refers to the application of audit procedures to less than 100% of items within a population relevant under the audit such that all sampling units (i.e. all the items in the population) have an equal chance of selection. In the given situation, senior team member is not selecting items for testing by means of audit sampling. He is only selecting specific items from a population . In accordance with SA 500, one of the means available to auditor for selecting items for testing is “by selecting specific items." Specific items selected may include: - High value or key items: The auditor may decide to select specific items within a population because they are of high value, or exhibit some other characteristic, for example, items that are suspicious, unusual, particularly risk-prone or have a history of error. All items over a certain amount: The auditor may decide to examine items whose recorded values exceed a certain amount so as to verify a large proportion of the total amount of a class of transactions or account balance. Items to obtain information: The auditor may examine items to obtain information about matters such as the nature of the entity or the nature of transactions. Therefore, Sanjeev's understanding is not proper. The above approach for selecting items for testing is subject to non-sampling risk. Non-sampling risk is the risk that auditor may reach an erroneous conclusion for any reason not related to sampling risk. Like, erroneous conclusion may be reached due to some inappropriate audit procedure.
Topics: Audit Evidence
Related Questions in this Topic
- VW & Co., Chartered Accountants, are auditing GHI Ltd., a company engaged in infrastructure development. The company has...
- TUV & Co., Chartered Accountants, are appointed as statutory auditors of DEF Ltd. for the year ending on 31st March, 202...
- While evaluating the reliability of audit evidence, the audit team identifies the following documents: Delivery challa...
- An auditor wants to ensure that he has complete knowledge of all locations where a company's inventories are stored. Sin...
- CA Arjun, the statutory auditor of XYZ Ltd., was engaged to conduct the audit of the financial statements for the financ...