Kanchan Finance Ltd. is a listed company. Since the term of the present statutory auditor is to hold office up to the conclusion of the upcoming…

CA Intermediate · Corporate and Other Laws · PYQS · May 2026
Kanchan Finance Ltd. is a listed company. Since the term of the present statutory auditor is to hold office up to the conclusion of the upcoming Annual General Meeting to be held on 25th August, 2026, the name of new statutory auditor, CA Trilok was placed before the Audit Committee. The audit committee recommended the name of CA Trilok for the consideration of the Board of Directors (BOD). However, the BOD was not convinced with the recommendations of the audit committee and it referred back the proposal to the audit committee for reconsideration. However, the members of the audit committee were not convinced with the reasons cited by the BOD and resent the proposal of CA Trilok to BOD again. The BOD was in disagreement with the opinion of the audit committee. In light of the above facts, answer the following referring to the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013: (i) Who are the competent authorities that shall recommend the name for appointment as the auditor and briefly discuss the points the competent authority shall take into consideration before appointing a Chartered Accountant as auditor? (2 Marks) (ii) How will the auditor be appointed in the present situation where the BOD disagrees with recommendations of the audit committee? (3 Marks)

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

(i) As per Rule 3 (1) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, a company which is required to constitute an Audit Committee under section 177 of the Companies Act, 2013, the competent authority would be the Audit Committee anda company which is not required to constitute an Audit Committee under section 177, the competent authority would be the Board of Directors. The competent authority shall take into consideration the qualifications and experience of the individual or the firm proposed to be considered for appointment as auditor and such qualifications and experience are commensurate with the size and requirements of the company. The competent Authority shall have regard to any order or pending proceeding relating to professional matters of conduct against the proposed auditor before the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) or any competent authority or any Court. It may call for such other information from the proposed auditor as it may deem fit. (ii) As per Rule 3 (1) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014: Where a company is required to constitute the Audit Committee, the committee shall recommend the name of an individual or a firm as auditor to the Board for consideration. Here, Kanchan Finance Ltd. is a listed company, therefore, Audit Committee shall be constituted by Board of directors under section 177. If the Board disagrees with the recommendation of the Audit Committee, it shall refer back the recommendation to the committee for reconsideration citing reasons for such disagreement. If the Audit Committee, after considering the reasons given by the Board, decides not to reconsider its original recommendation, the Board shall record reasons for its disagreement with the committee and send its own recommendation for consideration of the members in the annual general meeting. Therefore, in the instant case, as the Board of directors of Kanchan Finance Ltd. was in disagreement with the opinion of the Audit Committee regarding the appointment of CA Trilok as an auditor, the Board shall send its own recommendation for consideration of the members in the annual general meeting, where the members will decide on the appointment of the auditor.

Topics: Audit and Auditors

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic