Anvika & Associates LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership firm engaged in the architectural profession. It has two partners namely Anvika and…

CA Intermediate · Corporate and Other Laws · PYQS · May 2026
Anvika & Associates LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership firm engaged in the architectural profession. It has two partners namely Anvika and Ela and both are the designated partners. Anvika and Ela went to UK on 1st July, 2025 for taking advanced training in Architectural Science. The total training course was for 6 months only, but after the completion of training, they holidayed in Europe for some time and finally returned to India on 1st March, 2026. Before going to advanced training course, Anvika and Ela hired Falak, as an employee to look after the business of the LLP during their absence. Anvika and Ela kept interacting with Falak on the business-related issues, over phone and e-mail. Soon Falak won the confidence of the Anvika and Ela, and they both decided to induct Falak as partner in the LLP. They informed of their intention to admit Falak as a partner on 10th January, 2026. Falak accepted the offer of being a partner on 13th January in the LLP but with effect from 15th January, 2026. However, the LLP could not inform to the Registrar about the admission of new partner in the LLP Firm. Based on the facts given in above case scenario and by applying the relevant provisions of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 choose the correct answer to the Questions: (Question No. 12 and 13)
(A) No, as both the partners went abroad at the same time, the firm has violated the conditions of one partner of the firm being 'physically resident in India'.
(B) Yes, Anvika and Ela stayed for not less than 90 days in India, hence fulfilled the criteria of "Resident in India".
(C) Yes, Anvika and Ela stayed for not less than 120 days in India, hence fulfilled the criteria of "Resident in India".
(D) No, Anvika and Ela did not stay for a total period of 182 days in India, hence not fulfilled the criteria of being "Resident in India".

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Correct Answer: Option (C)

Yes, Anvika and Ela stayed for not less than 120 days in India, hence fulfilled the criteria of "Resident in India".

Topics: The Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic