M/s ABCD Capital Limited, a listed public company, was found guilty of manipulating its share prices through false disclosures in its quarterly…

CA Intermediate · Corporate and Other Laws · PYQS · January 2026
M/s ABCD Capital Limited, a listed public company, was found guilty of manipulating its share prices through false disclosures in its quarterly financial statements. The company's Managing Director, Mr. Arvind, was charged under: (1) Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013 (Fraud), and (2) Regulation 9 & 10 of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) Regulations, 2003 read with Section 24 of the SEBI Act, 1992, for misleading investors and distorting the securities market. The SEBI Adjudicating Officer imposed a monetary penalty of 25 lakh and recommended criminal prosecution. Later, the Special Court under the Companies Act also imposed a fine of 10 lakh and three years' imprisonment on Mr. Arvind for the same fraudulent act. Mr. Arvind appealed, raising two legal objections: (1) That he cannot be punished twice for the same act of fraud under both SEBI and the Companies Act (double punishment issue).
(A) (A) He cannot be trialed under both SEBI Act and Companies Act for the same fraudulent act.
(B) (B) He can be punished twice under both enactments for the same offence.
(C) (C) He can be trialed and convicted under both enactments but cannot be punished twice for the same offence.
(D) (D) Once SEBI imposes a penalty, Companies Act proceedings automatically become void.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Correct Answer: Option (C)

(C) He can be trialed and convicted under both enactments but cannot be punished twice for the same offence.

Topics: The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, The General Clauses Act, 1897

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic