Apex Manufacturing is an industrial company based in India. Recently, the company found itself embroiled in legal issues concerning two separate…

CA Intermediate · Corporate and Other Laws · RTP · September 2024
Apex Manufacturing is an industrial company based in India. Recently, the company found itself embroiled in legal issues concerning two separate offences under different enactments. The first offence involved a violation of environmental regulations, for which the company was prosecuted and fined. Subsequently, Apex Manufacturing was charged under a different law for a similar but not identical environmental violation. The first offence was under the Environment Protection Act, 1986, for failing to dispose of hazardous waste properly. The second offence, under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, involved discharging untreated wastewater into a river. Mr. Sharma, the company's legal advisor, consulted on said issue. He determined the prosecution outlined in Section 26 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, and Article 20(2) of the Constitution of India, which protects against double jeopardy. Comment upon the validity of protection that can be given to the Apex Manufacturing.
(A) Yes valid, because both involve environmental violations.
(B) Not valid, because the specific actions and legal provisions violated are different.
(C) Its valid, because both result in environmental harm.
(D) Its valid, though were prosecuted under different Acts but nature of act is similar.

Suggested Answer and Working Notes:

Correct Answer: Option (B)

Not valid, because the specific actions and legal provisions violated are different.

Topics: The General Clauses Act, 1897, Prospectus and Allotment of Securities

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic