Mr. Rachit purchased a new house and after some time he shifted to his new house. He was regularly filing his Income Tax Return but he did not…
CA Intermediate · Corporate and Other Laws · MTP · May 2024
Mr. Rachit purchased a new house and after some time he shifted to his new house. He was regularly filing his Income Tax Return but he did not update his address with the Income Tax Department. The Income Tax department sent a show cause notice to Mr. Rachit whereby the time limit for reply was 15 days from service of notice. The notice was properly sent by registered post to his address which was in the records of the Income Tax Department. The notice reached at old house and present owner of that house refused to accept that notice. After a certain period, the Income Tax Department took a penal action against Mr. Rachit. He requested the department, that he should not be charged as he did not receive the said notice. Advise in terms of the provisions of the General Clauses Act, 1897, whether sending of the show cause notice by the Income Tax Department would be considered proper service of notice?
Suggested Answer and Working Notes:
According to section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, where any legislation or regulation requires any document to be served by post, then unless a different intention appears, the service shall be deemed to be effected by: (i) properly addressing (ii) pre-paying, and (iii) posting by registered post. Further, on the basis of decision taken by the apex court in case of Jagdish Singh vs Natthu Singh, where a notice is sent to the landlord by registered post and the same is returned by the tenant with an endorsement of refusal, it will be presumed that the notice has been served. In the given case, the Income Tax Department sent the show cause notice properly by a registered post at the address which was in the records of the department. Hence, it was a proper service of notice. Further, refusal by current owner of house to accept the notice, will not amount to- that the notice was not properly served by the Income Tax Department. It was the duty of Mr. Rachit to update his address. Therefore, Income Tax Department is correct in its decision.
Topics: The General Clauses Act, 1897
Related Questions in this Topic
- 15. Ms. Farah is examining a Central Act which received the assent of the President on 10th January 2026, but the Act it...
- 14. Which of the following statements is/are correct with respect to the effect of repeal of an enactment under Section ...
- 14. Ritika pledged her shares in XYZ Ltd. as security for a loan. During a discussion, one of her friends argued that sh...
- 13. Bright Future Welfare Association, an unincorporated association of individuals, entered into a statutory arrangemen...
- The Community Development Incentives Act, 2010 provides certain tax benefits to organizations engaged in charitable and ...